Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Bame <bame@fc.hp.com>
To: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@puffin.external.hp.com>,
	Charles Boone <ccboone@yahoo.com>,
	parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: Problem installing .9 iso image on C240
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:23:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E15KLpt-0003hL-00@noam.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:46:24 BST." <20010711094624.F18375@linuxcare.com>

= > > I do have one question, why
= > > would it not try to install the 64bit version? I was
= > > pretty sure that a C240 is a 64bit system.

As others said, it's a 64-bit-capable CPU with 32-bit-only firmware and
only 32-bit kernels work there right now.  I don't know that a 64-bit
kernel buys you much on a C240 -- am I mistaken?

= > PDC on the C240 (and similar C-models of that generation) only
= > support PDC calls in "narrow" (ie 32-bit) mode. Sounds like the decision
= > to install 32 vs 64-bit depends on the PDC capabilities bit.
= > Can anyone offhand confirm/deny?

Yes, palo asks the firmware whether one or both of 32&64-bit OSs will
run on the box.  Cxxx says 32 bit only.  If both are possible, palo
chooses 32-bit for now.

= a 64 bit kernel with narrow PDC
= calls later would be an option (once it works).  Do we leave building
= that kernel as an exercise for the user, or or do we have one packaged
= in the archive?

When it works we can add a config file for building a suitably flavored
debian kernel-image package.

	-P

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-11 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20010709220547.W23509@linuxcare.com>
     [not found] ` <20010710040536.41333.qmail@web11203.mail.yahoo.com>
2001-07-10 13:31   ` [parisc-linux] Re: Problem installing .9 iso image on C240 Richard Hirst
2001-07-10 14:23     ` Charles Boone
2001-07-10 15:02       ` Richard Hirst
2001-07-11  5:45       ` Grant Grundler
2001-07-11  8:46         ` Richard Hirst
2001-07-11 15:23           ` Paul Bame [this message]
2001-07-11 20:38             ` Grant Grundler
2001-07-12  5:23           ` Grant Grundler
2001-07-13  2:09             ` Ryan Bradetich
2001-07-11  5:36     ` Grant Grundler
2001-07-11  8:48       ` Richard Hirst
2001-07-12 14:42         ` Charles Boone
2001-07-12 15:20           ` Richard Hirst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E15KLpt-0003hL-00@noam.fc.hp.com \
    --to=bame@fc.hp.com \
    --cc=ccboone@yahoo.com \
    --cc=grundler@puffin.external.hp.com \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=rhirst@linuxcare.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox