From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m155101.qiye.163.com (mail-m155101.qiye.163.com [101.71.155.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244413DF008 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 03:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=101.71.155.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790651711; cv=none; b=DqoHE5B4v97Zemu8DvEgbeHdLnKm0gSaoRFOJAID2p8zF7izFLWBMEN04OnqpVJMJYhGoqdpDnhpTxnt0jgS/Nx10ppo8d5d19SGLOP4wdQOXkzXRda3ZtJ+jyLAHmtnr+1NJkOQ2sjsFnaFTL2wh/c0HGdTYAOk6r2TB29ys20= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790651711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7ATZzcjlAbIUysEWPC1sJrxMeSl+5dNimqHb7qWpGJE=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=opTVwY6JnizbmvEkBtaN/1wTUhmzUfIyRxQhutXl6xxBR3+aO/GNRhSYDS/GACkVJNEBlVeREtZMPtrG9wHOo3cEKwQTIdGy3DWoM8Dk3PYlx6+o8zsuEQXdg+FT9xmg+gJLZUnx5rwNq0Y5+n9M7RQCdqu/JPzZ/Bra7Zhhzzw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=stu.pku.edu.cn; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=stu.pku.edu.cn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=stu.pku.edu.cn header.i=@stu.pku.edu.cn header.b=GImO/piJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=101.71.155.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=stu.pku.edu.cn Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=stu.pku.edu.cn Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=stu.pku.edu.cn header.i=@stu.pku.edu.cn header.b="GImO/piJ" Received: from Breeze (unknown [106.120.124.42]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 4f6eb5455; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:14:51 +0800 (GMT+08:00) From: To: "'Miguel Ojeda'" Cc: , , , , References: <20260928102547.201475-1-ojeda@kernel.org> <20260928105443.205758-1-ojeda@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260928105443.205758-1-ojeda@kernel.org> Subject: =?gb2312?B?u9i4tDogW1BBVENIIDYuMTggMjEwLzM5OF0gcnVzdDogbmV0OiBwaA==?= =?gb2312?B?eTogZml4IG9mZi1ieS1vbmUgYml0IHBvc2l0aW9ucyBpbiBkZXZpY2Ugc3Q=?= =?gb2312?B?YXR1cyBhY2Nlc3NvcnM=?= Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:14:50 +0800 Message-ID: <000101dd4fc0$b1871cc0$14955640$@stu.pku.edu.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIRphZJ1CETCX/ZQSG8ISseq2E43gJFGQowtmoMXaA= Content-Language: zh-cn X-HM-Tid: 0aa0eb2872a203a1kunmd480f09921ff4c X-HM-MType: 10 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFITzdXWRgWCB1ZQUpXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlDQhkeVkJIGhlLTUtLTRkeT1YeHw 5VEwETFhoSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlKS01VSklLVUpJT1VPSVlXWRYaDxIVHRRZQVlPS0hVSktISk 5MTlVKS0tVSkJLS1kG DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=GImO/piJH5Xyc6AOltGYU7Utm1K2tIFz9foMfoGD2ONqzb6G1QGAFtESahsbrUKWH+aS/5JOUSVE1D+GRWrhiH7ZaqVKZ0QP0oDcdIKcOZCueW4ij9eJvSUAWuYWxdupGzugd1mDNA2vWlZnz1j5aioQsCjcX1fgDMg7Q3BaFn0=; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=stu.pku.edu.cn; v=1; bh=/0/VwX3V1eumlzPFP2EZdkcpd6K+fi16jwBW4u48HT0=; h=date:mime-version:subject:message-id:from; Hi Miguel, Yes, that is exactly what I meant -- thanks a lot for taking care of it. I re-checked the series against v6.18 and it is correct: 1d17bf1ae87d (6.18.y today) -> bf6272d87a7b (1/2, back to v6.18) -> 5963dbbd54af (2/2, offsets = 15/14/16) That matches the backport I had prepared locally, so: Acked-by: Chunfeng Song Please keep yourself as the author of 2/2, and of course I am fine with your SoB -- the upstream Signed-off-by is enough for me. One nit, feel free to ignore: 2/2 still carries the upstream paragraph starting "Use the bindgen-generated raw accessors ..." and the Cc: = stable scope line, neither of which matches the diff anymore. Your bracketed note already explains it, but dropping those two bits may read better. Thanks again, Chunfeng -----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE----- =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Miguel Ojeda =20 =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2026=C4=EA9=D4=C228=C8=D5 18:55 =CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: ojeda@kernel.org =B3=AD=CB=CD: fujita.tomonori@gmail.com; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; kuba@kernel.org; patches@lists.linux.dev; springbreeze@stu.pku.edu.cn; stable@vger.kernel.org =D6=F7=CC=E2: Re: [PATCH 6.18 210/398] rust: net: phy: fix off-by-one = bit positions in device status accessors On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 12:25:47 +0200 Miguel Ojeda = wrote: > > Let me send a quick series using a revert which is clearer, and if=20 > that is what you meant, then please confirm you are OK with the SoB! Done: = https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20260928104855.205416-1-ojeda@kernel.org/ I ended up sending #2 in the series with myself as author just in case, = but if you somehow had posted it elsewhere, or if you prefer to be listed as author, please let us now! Cheers, Miguel