From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/20] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:55:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08ca8fe7-9da6-41da-aad2-0081b789326c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528222006.58283-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 5/28/24 3:19 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> This series based on top of Linus upstream commit 33e02dc69afb ("Merge
> tag 'sound-6.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound")
>
> The Sub-NUMA cluster feature on some Intel processors partitions the CPUs
> that share an L3 cache into two or more sets. This plays havoc with the
> Resource Director Technology (RDT) monitoring features. Prior to this
> patch Intel has advised that SNC and RDT are incompatible.
>
> Some of these CPUs support an MSR that can partition the RMID counters
> in the same way. This allows monitoring features to be used. Legacy
> monitoring files provide the sum of counters from each SNC node for
> backwards compatibility. Additional files per SNC node provide details
> per node.
>
> Cache and memory bandwidth allocation features continue to operate at
> the scope of the L3 cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
>
> ---
> Changes since v18: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240515222326.74166-1-tony.luck@intel.com/
>
> Global: Consistent use of "Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC)"
(briefly scanning changes)
>
> 1-4: No change
>
> 5: Rename RESCTRL_NODE as RESCTRL_L3_NODE to make it clear that
> these "nodes" are each subsets of L3 cache instances.
>
> 6: Changes for snc_nodes_per_l3_cache are localized to monitor.c
> Don't use it in decision block use of mba_MBps option.
> Moved the old get_node_rmid() function here, but renamed it to
> logical_rmid_to_physical_rmid() with a block comment explaining
> how RMIDs are distributed when SNC is enabled. Function now
> checks if snc_nodes_per_l3_cache == 1 for fast return.
>
> 7: New patch. Only allow mba_MBps option if scope of MBM matches MBA
>
> 8: Replaces old patch 8. "display_id" field is no more. Add and
> initialize the @ci (struct cachinfo *) to rdt_mon_domain.
> Note that the new get_cpu_cacheinfo_level() helper function is
> added to internal.h as it will also be needed by patch 19.
>
> 9: Instead of display_id, add pointer to cacheinfo structure to
> struct rmid_read. Add kerneldoc description of existing and
> new fields.
>
> 10: Added to commit comment describing why mkdir_mondata_subdir()
> needs to be refactored.
>
> 11: Dropped Intel specific description of fields in the mon_evt
> structure. Say that choice of bit to steal was arbitrary, but
> can be changed in the future.
>
> 12: Fixed typo s/and file/and files/ in commit message. Now using
> the cacheinfo structure (specifically "id" field) instead of
> display_id.
>
> 13: Wordsmith commit into imperative.
> I looked at using kobject_has_children() to check for empty
> directory, but it needs a "struct kobject *" and all I have
> is "struct kernfs_node *". I'm now checking how many CPUs
Consider how kobject_has_children() uses that struct kobject *.
Specifically:
return kobj->sd && kobj->sd->dir.subdirs
It operates on kobj->sd, which is exactly what you have: struct kernfs_node.
> remain in ci->shared_cpu_map to detect whether this is the
> last SNC node.
hmmm, ok, will take a look ... but please finalize discussion of a patch series
before submitting a new series that rejects feedback without discussion and
does something completely different in new version.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 22:19 [PATCH v19 00/20] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 01/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new domain scope Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 02/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare to split rdt_domain structure Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 03/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare for different scope for control/monitor operations Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 04/20] x86/resctrl: Split the rdt_domain and rdt_hw_domain structures Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 05/20] x86/resctrl: Add node-scope to the options for feature scope Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 06/20] x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:20 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-31 18:17 ` Tony Luck
2024-06-07 16:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 07/20] x86/resctrl: Block use of mba_MBps mount option on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 08/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-31 0:26 ` Tony Luck
2024-05-31 16:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 09/20] x86/resctrl: Add new fields to struct rmid_read for summation of domains Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 10/20] x86/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() with a helper function Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 11/20] x86/resctrl: Allocate a new bit in union mon_data_bits Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 12/20] x86/resctrl: Create Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 13/20] x86/resctrl: Handle removing directories in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 14/20] x86/resctrl: Fill out rmid_read structure for smp_call*() to read a counter Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 15/20] x86/resctrl: Pass two extra arguments to resctrl_arch_rmid_read() Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 16/20] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() handle sum over domains Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-03 23:15 ` Tony Luck
2024-06-07 16:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-07 19:51 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-07 21:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 17/20] x86/resctrl: Update CPU sanity checks when reading RMID counters Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 18/20] x86/resctrl: Enable RMID shared RMID mode on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 19/20] x86/resctrl: Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) detection and enabling Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 20/20] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:55 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-05-29 20:20 ` [PATCH v19 00/20] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-05-30 2:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-30 16:36 ` Tony Luck
2024-05-30 17:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-30 22:49 ` Luck, Tony
2024-05-30 23:10 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08ca8fe7-9da6-41da-aad2-0081b789326c@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).