* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review
2025-09-08 16:04 [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-09-08 16:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-08 18:50 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-09-08 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/8/25 09:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.151 release.
> There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:18:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.151-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review
2025-09-08 16:04 [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-08 16:58 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-09-08 18:50 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2025-09-09 6:06 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2025-09-08 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.1.151-rc2-00153-ge60b159208e6 #79 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Sep 8 18:45:49 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review
2025-09-08 16:04 [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-08 16:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-09-08 18:50 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2025-09-09 6:06 ` Ron Economos
2025-09-09 8:05 ` Jon Hunter
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-09-09 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On 9/8/25 09:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.151 release.
> There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:18:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.151-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review
2025-09-08 16:04 [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-09 6:06 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-09-09 8:05 ` Jon Hunter
2025-09-09 12:44 ` Peter Schneider
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-09-09 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 08 Sep 2025 18:04:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.151 release.
> There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:18:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.151-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
119 tests: 119 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.151-rc2-ge60b159208e6
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review
2025-09-08 16:04 [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-09 8:05 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-09-09 12:44 ` Peter Schneider
2025-09-09 16:00 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-09 17:38 ` Hardik Garg
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-09-09 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
Am 08.09.2025 um 18:04 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.151 release.
> There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Just like rc1, rc2 builds, boots and works fine on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or
regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review
2025-09-08 16:04 [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-09 12:44 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-09-09 16:00 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-09-09 17:38 ` Hardik Garg
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-09-09 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill
On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 21:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.151 release.
> There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:18:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.151-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
While running booting Juno-r2 device with Linux stable-rc 6.1.151-rc2
kernel found this RCU info followed by boot hang.
Regression Analysis:
- Reproducibility? Validation is in progress
Boot regression: stable-rc 6.1.151-rc2 juno-r2 cpuidle_enter_state hang
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
### Boot log
[ 975.847953] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
[ 975.853724] rcu: \t3-...!: (5249 ticks this GP)
idle=25dc/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1901/1901 fqs=0
[ 975.862973] \t(t=5253 jiffies g=2077 q=8479 ncpus=6)
[ 975.867862] rcu: rcu_preempt kthread timer wakeup didn't happen for
5253 jiffies! g2077 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402
[ 975.879192] rcu: \tPossible timer handling issue on cpu=5 timer-softirq=408
[ 975.886079] rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 5259 jiffies!
g2077 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=5
[ 975.896453] rcu: \tUnless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU
time, OOM is now expected behavior.
[ 975.905601] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
[ 975.910658] task:rcu_preempt state:I stack:0 pid:16
ppid:2 flags:0x00000008
[ 975.919035] Call trace:
[ 975.921482] __switch_to+0x154/0x1f8
[ 975.925075] __schedule+0x494/0x8a0
[ 975.928577] schedule+0x84/0xe8
[ 975.931729] schedule_timeout+0xac/0x19c
[ 975.935662] rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x1f4/0x808
[ 975.939598] rcu_gp_kthread+0x70/0x238
[ 975.943359] kthread+0xe8/0x1cc
[ 975.946509] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 975.950096] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran:
[ 975.955589] Task dump for CPU 5:
[ 975.958819] task:swapper/5 state:R running task stack:0
pid:0 ppid:1 flags:0x00000008
[ 975.968764] Call trace:
[ 975.971210] __switch_to+0x154/0x1f8
[ 975.974798] ct_idle_enter+0x10/0x1c
[ 975.978384] 0xffff00097edb0640
[ 975.981541] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.1.151-rc2 #1
[ 975.987912] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT)
[ 975.993843] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 976.000823] pc : cpuidle_enter_state+0x16c/0x444
[ 976.005456] lr : cpuidle_enter_state+0x160/0x444
[ 976.010086] sp : ffff80000aaa3d70
[ 976.013403] x29: ffff80000aaa3d70 x28: ffff80000a2de000 x27: ffff80000a2a5638
[ 976.020566] x26: 0000000000000001 x25: ffff0008222b4898 x24: 000000e33511dfc8
[ 976.027727] x23: 000000e334d58fb4 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: 0000000000000001
[ 976.034888] x20: ffff0008222b4880 x19: ffff00097ed72640 x18: 0000000000000219
[ 976.042049] x17: 000000040044ffff x16: 00500072b5503510 x15: 0000000000000000
[ 976.049210] x14: ffff80000a9020dc x13: ffff80000aaa0000 x12: ffff80000aaa4000
[ 976.056372] x11: 1ada3b6729410000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
[ 976.063532] x8 : 00000000000000e0 x7 : 00000072b5503510 x6 : 0000000000300000
[ 976.070693] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff80000aaa3dd0
[ 976.077854] x2 : ffff80000aaa3d08 x1 : ffff80000905fdec x0 : ffff80000905fa90
[ 976.085015] Call trace:
[ 976.087462] cpuidle_enter_state+0x16c/0x444
[ 976.091746] cpuidle_enter+0x44/0x5c
[ 976.095331] do_idle+0x1f4/0x2c4
[ 976.098571] cpu_startup_entry+0x40/0x44
[ 976.102507] secondary_start_kernel+0x12c/0x150
[ 976.107053] __secondary_switched+0xb0/0xb4
[ 976.111251] Task dump for CPU 4:
[ 976.114482] task:swapper/4 state:R running task stack:0
pid:0 ppid:1 flags:0x00000008
[ 976.124427] Call trace:
[ 976.126873] __switch_to+0x154/0x1f8
[ 976.130462] psci_enter_idle_state+0x5c/0x7c
[ 976.134747] cpuidle_enter_state+0x118/0x444
[ 976.139028] cpuidle_enter+0x44/0x5c
[ 976.142613] do_idle+0x1f4/0x2c4
[ 976.145852] cpu_startup_entry+0x40/0x44
[ 976.149788] secondary_start_kernel+0x12c/0x150
[ 976.154333] __secondary_switched+0xb0/0xb4
[ 976.158530] Task dump for CPU 5:
[ 976.161761] task:rcu_preempt state:R running task stack:0
pid:16 ppid:2 flags:0x00000008
[ 976.171705] Call trace:
[ 976.174152] __switch_to+0x154/0x1f8
[ 976.177739] 0x0
[ 1039.195951] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
[ 1039.202056] rcu: \t5-...!: (0 ticks this GP) idle=e028/0/0x0
softirq=1512/1512 fqs=1 (false positive?)
[ 1039.211296] \t(detected by 2, t=21087 jiffies, g=2077, q=8483 ncpus=6)
[ 1039.217746] Task dump for CPU 5:
[ 1039.220974] task:swapper/5 state:R running task stack:0
pid:0 ppid:1 flags:0x00000008
[ 1039.230911] Call trace:
[ 1039.233355] __switch_to+0x154/0x1f8
[ 1039.236938] ct_idle_enter+0x10/0x1c
[ 1039.240518] 0xffff00097edb0640
[ 1039.243661] rcu: rcu_preempt kthread timer wakeup didn't happen for
15764 jiffies! g2077 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402
[ 1039.255073] rcu: \tPossible timer handling issue on cpu=5 timer-softirq=408
[ 1039.261957] rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 15770 jiffies!
g2077 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=5
[ 1039.272411] rcu: \tUnless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU
time, OOM is now expected behavior.
[ 1039.281555] rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
[ 1039.286609] task:rcu_preempt state:I stack:0 pid:16
ppid:2 flags:0x00000008
[ 1039.294977] Call trace:
[ 1039.297420] __switch_to+0x154/0x1f8
[ 1039.301001] __schedule+0x494/0x8a0
[ 1039.304495] schedule+0x84/0xe8
[ 1039.307641] schedule_timeout+0xac/0x19c
[ 1039.311567] rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x1f4/0x808
[ 1039.315496] rcu_gp_kthread+0x70/0x238
[ 1039.319249] kthread+0xe8/0x1cc
[ 1039.322391] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 1039.325971] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran:
[ 1039.331459] Task dump for CPU 5:
[ 1039.334686] task:swapper/5 state:R running task stack:0
pid:0 ppid:1 flags:0x00000008
[ 1039.344622] Call trace:
[ 1039.347065] __switch_to+0x154/0x1f8
[ 1039.350646] ct_idle_enter+0x10/0x1c
[ 1039.354225] 0xffff00097edb0640
[ 1039.412051] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
[ 1039.417488] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronize Cache(10) failed: Result:
hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/api/testruns/29825860/log_file/
- https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/8439988#L2145
- https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/tests/32QLuLpnnwp9AnZEJVgmvKIFxXT
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/32QLrp4K8PORz7gTLeqeiSIGTKL/config
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/32QLrp4K8PORz7gTLeqeiSIGTKL/
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.151-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: e60b159208e69c485efd270b6bd1fedd07e1aaad
* git describe: v6.1.149-153-ge60b159208e6
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.149-153-ge60b159208e6
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.149-51-gcdcdd968ff27)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.149-51-gcdcdd968ff27)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.149-51-gcdcdd968ff27)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.149-51-gcdcdd968ff27)
## Test result summary
total: 231778, pass: 215616, fail: 4719, skip: 11160, xfail: 283
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 133 total, 133 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review
2025-09-08 16:04 [PATCH 6.1 000/101] 6.1.151-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-09 16:00 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-09-09 17:38 ` Hardik Garg
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-09-09 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: achill, akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, perf tool, and kselftest builds fine for v6.1.151-rc2 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread