From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82FF37E for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 03:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 884A0C4347C; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 03:15:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1667358946; bh=Rdtz2+NMlHqfzvnBhPb7jsXkgsCrR+NxMxJNqpYP2m8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yZ3WuD8RWACYBh/U+O1t5AAP0KS3g43D+Z5SidmlEeA/HxpQy6hbl44yNU7cmnMHX idc0n470Dvffi5glhKArs7ToLARslQ+9UDHMPrazfPZzZlEeyJIkaQBp0NJCbInk7K bt3emblHj9mNIk0JL34I2T8Rk3B7OZJYZRCpDtY4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Raju Rangoju , Tom Lendacky , Jakub Kicinski , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 51/91] amd-xgbe: fix the SFP compliance codes check for DAC cables Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 03:33:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20221102022056.470705586@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221102022055.039689234@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20221102022055.039689234@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Raju Rangoju [ Upstream commit 09c5f6bf11ac98874339e55f4f5f79a9dbc9b375 ] The current XGBE code assumes that offset 6 of EEPROM SFP DAC (passive) cables is NULL. However, some cables (the 5 meter and 7 meter Molex passive cables) have non-zero data at offset 6. Fix the logic by moving the passive cable check above the active checks, so as not to be improperly identified as an active cable. This will fix the issue for any passive cable that advertises 1000Base-CX in offset 6. Fixes: abf0a1c2b26a ("amd-xgbe: Add support for SFP+ modules") Signed-off-by: Raju Rangoju Acked-by: Tom Lendacky Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c index 213769054391..21e38b720d87 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-phy-v2.c @@ -1151,7 +1151,10 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata) } /* Determine the type of SFP */ - if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR) + if (phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE && + xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000)) + phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR; + else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_SR) phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_SR; else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_10GBE_CC_LR) phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_LR; @@ -1167,9 +1170,6 @@ static void xgbe_phy_sfp_parse_eeprom(struct xgbe_prv_data *pdata) phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_CX; else if (sfp_base[XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC] & XGBE_SFP_BASE_1GBE_CC_T) phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T; - else if ((phy_data->sfp_cable == XGBE_SFP_CABLE_PASSIVE) && - xgbe_phy_sfp_bit_rate(sfp_eeprom, XGBE_SFP_SPEED_10000)) - phy_data->sfp_base = XGBE_SFP_BASE_10000_CR; switch (phy_data->sfp_base) { case XGBE_SFP_BASE_1000_T: -- 2.35.1