From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5598015CAB for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EC54C433C1; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:49:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1667915365; bh=3Z/04EcQBnV5yb+bNbMfnCEgeFHTJ/KXYg8anu0JTNI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JhPeIWLPdk88Dc5dZ2CAA1dvELKhLflgf17z7oX9+CYCT7pvQAMZI3KqC5yJRXX/N 6n6A/ADdgRR+dmSQ0xenKe57XQ9urNK7t7Df6Wud8SBo+/S9GZ+w/IZgVZsSNJ2PsS 4sp1jepNaOfDiGxMRtgtpdQElQmuFpDfLeKg5aSY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , "Darrick J. Wong" , Chandan Babu R Subject: [PATCH 5.4 39/74] xfs: gut error handling in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 14:39:07 +0100 Message-Id: <20221108133335.335644067@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221108133333.659601604@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20221108133333.659601604@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Dave Chinner commit dc3ffbb14060c943469d5e12900db3a60bc3fa64 upstream. The error handling in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() is largely incorrect - rolling back the changes in the transaction if only one counter underruns makes all the other counters incorrect. We still allow the change to proceed and committing the transaction, except now we have multiple incorrect counters instead of a single underflow. Further, we don't actually report the error to the caller, so this is completely silent except on debug kernels that will assert on failure before we even get to the rollback code. Hence this error handling is broken, untested, and largely unnecessary complexity. Just remove it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 163 ++++++----------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-) --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c @@ -532,57 +532,9 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas( sizeof(sbp->sb_frextents) - 1); } -STATIC int -xfs_sb_mod8( - uint8_t *field, - int8_t delta) -{ - int8_t counter = *field; - - counter += delta; - if (counter < 0) { - ASSERT(0); - return -EINVAL; - } - *field = counter; - return 0; -} - -STATIC int -xfs_sb_mod32( - uint32_t *field, - int32_t delta) -{ - int32_t counter = *field; - - counter += delta; - if (counter < 0) { - ASSERT(0); - return -EINVAL; - } - *field = counter; - return 0; -} - -STATIC int -xfs_sb_mod64( - uint64_t *field, - int64_t delta) -{ - int64_t counter = *field; - - counter += delta; - if (counter < 0) { - ASSERT(0); - return -EINVAL; - } - *field = counter; - return 0; -} - /* - * xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() is called to release unused reservations - * and apply superblock counter changes to the in-core superblock. The + * xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb() is called to release unused reservations and + * apply superblock counter changes to the in-core superblock. The * t_res_fdblocks_delta and t_res_frextents_delta fields are explicitly NOT * applied to the in-core superblock. The idea is that that has already been * done. @@ -627,20 +579,17 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb( /* apply the per-cpu counters */ if (blkdelta) { error = xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, blkdelta, rsvd); - if (error) - goto out; + ASSERT(!error); } if (idelta) { error = xfs_mod_icount(mp, idelta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_fdblocks; + ASSERT(!error); } if (ifreedelta) { error = xfs_mod_ifree(mp, ifreedelta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_icount; + ASSERT(!error); } if (rtxdelta == 0 && !(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) @@ -648,95 +597,23 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb( /* apply remaining deltas */ spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock); - if (rtxdelta) { - error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_frextents, rtxdelta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_ifree; - } - - if (tp->t_dblocks_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks, tp->t_dblocks_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_frextents; - } - if (tp->t_agcount_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_agcount, tp->t_agcount_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_dblocks; - } - if (tp->t_imaxpct_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod8(&mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct, tp->t_imaxpct_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_agcount; - } - if (tp->t_rextsize_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, - tp->t_rextsize_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_imaxpct; - } - if (tp->t_rbmblocks_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks, - tp->t_rbmblocks_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_rextsize; - } - if (tp->t_rblocks_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks, tp->t_rblocks_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_rbmblocks; - } - if (tp->t_rextents_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextents, - tp->t_rextents_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_rblocks; - } - if (tp->t_rextslog_delta != 0) { - error = xfs_sb_mod8(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextslog, - tp->t_rextslog_delta); - if (error) - goto out_undo_rextents; - } + mp->m_sb.sb_frextents += rtxdelta; + mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks += tp->t_dblocks_delta; + mp->m_sb.sb_agcount += tp->t_agcount_delta; + mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct += tp->t_imaxpct_delta; + mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize += tp->t_rextsize_delta; + mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks += tp->t_rbmblocks_delta; + mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks += tp->t_rblocks_delta; + mp->m_sb.sb_rextents += tp->t_rextents_delta; + mp->m_sb.sb_rextslog += tp->t_rextslog_delta; spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock); - return; -out_undo_rextents: - if (tp->t_rextents_delta) - xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextents, -tp->t_rextents_delta); -out_undo_rblocks: - if (tp->t_rblocks_delta) - xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks, -tp->t_rblocks_delta); -out_undo_rbmblocks: - if (tp->t_rbmblocks_delta) - xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rbmblocks, -tp->t_rbmblocks_delta); -out_undo_rextsize: - if (tp->t_rextsize_delta) - xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize, -tp->t_rextsize_delta); -out_undo_imaxpct: - if (tp->t_rextsize_delta) - xfs_sb_mod8(&mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct, -tp->t_imaxpct_delta); -out_undo_agcount: - if (tp->t_agcount_delta) - xfs_sb_mod32(&mp->m_sb.sb_agcount, -tp->t_agcount_delta); -out_undo_dblocks: - if (tp->t_dblocks_delta) - xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks, -tp->t_dblocks_delta); -out_undo_frextents: - if (rtxdelta) - xfs_sb_mod64(&mp->m_sb.sb_frextents, -rtxdelta); -out_undo_ifree: - spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock); - if (ifreedelta) - xfs_mod_ifree(mp, -ifreedelta); -out_undo_icount: - if (idelta) - xfs_mod_icount(mp, -idelta); -out_undo_fdblocks: - if (blkdelta) - xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, -blkdelta, rsvd); -out: - ASSERT(error == 0); + /* + * Debug checks outside of the spinlock so they don't lock up the + * machine if they fail. + */ + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_imax_pct >= 0); + ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_rextslog >= 0); return; }