From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D791863 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B32EC433EF; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:03:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1672239788; bh=Ve7Gt19B41ulMObmLoJP1Zw1apIg7+STq8HY4gTukfY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yTB7b/wlG7/770Rinb4SSfiUwzYw/Sq+M00fesY2jHoSgUQzwp7zTfZg8GWpYPf3Z 1+xqpWf6KiUWTPzH7ieY4+Ibo1wt9iJrJK3w0VgLEx5vs+piTQNul5vh4+d0Pn0Oeq cj1pFUn1DLJHCfz+osVTgiAQSF8ZYPCazn8ljH+w= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Fabrizio Castro , Geert Uytterhoeven , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1 0043/1146] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g011: Fix I2C SoC specific strings Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:26:22 +0100 Message-Id: <20221228144331.333322460@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0 In-Reply-To: <20221228144330.180012208@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20221228144330.180012208@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Fabrizio Castro [ Upstream commit 2ac909916b520df09a23f152bb9016d7b892b496 ] The preferred form for Renesas' compatible strings is: ",-" Somehow the compatible string for the r9a09g011 I2C IP was upstreamed as renesas,i2c-r9a09g011 instead of renesas,r9a09g011-i2c, which is really confusing, especially considering the generic fallback is renesas,rzv2m-i2c. The first user of renesas,i2c-r9a09g011 in the kernel is not yet in a kernel release, it will be in v6.1, therefore it can still be fixed in v6.1. Even if we don't fix it before v6.2, I don't think there is any harm in making such a change. s/renesas,i2c-r9a09g011/renesas,r9a09g011-i2c/g for consistency. Fixes: 54ac6794df9d ("arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g011: Add i2c nodes") Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221107165027.54150-3-fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g011.dtsi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g011.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g011.dtsi index 0e72a66f8e3a..ebaa8cdd747d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g011.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g011.dtsi @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ cpg: clock-controller@a3500000 { i2c0: i2c@a4030000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - compatible = "renesas,i2c-r9a09g011", "renesas,rzv2m-i2c"; + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g011-i2c", "renesas,rzv2m-i2c"; reg = <0 0xa4030000 0 0x80>; interrupts = , ; @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ i2c0: i2c@a4030000 { i2c2: i2c@a4030100 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - compatible = "renesas,i2c-r9a09g011", "renesas,rzv2m-i2c"; + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g011-i2c", "renesas,rzv2m-i2c"; reg = <0 0xa4030100 0 0x80>; interrupts = , ; -- 2.35.1