From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A428820 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60D71C4339B; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:46:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1678459601; bh=gMPbaTDfJ1dvSoVqfAG5jDul9zjlycyet/arz3jMpKw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0njazf1m1dXucGsLHjkrF7tY++J3AdGPOWQ0SyNxdX7XnOaJKRBfplu1UkR01yofq 8rbi63BktWq5jfAOv9lWJDXoRluDY4GSJ4dP78NF1rdz0DSXB6cveEFwpSrQcORUwV QMoW6rEMbLnIMjdBACcqJKDZWFjFV9JJ9J5nl6DI= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Yang Yingliang , Kalle Valo , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 059/529] wifi: ipw2x00: dont call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave() Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:33:22 +0100 Message-Id: <20230310133807.728939374@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230310133804.978589368@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230310133804.978589368@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Yang Yingliang [ Upstream commit 45fc6d7461f18df2f238caf0cbc5acc4163203d1 ] It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() or consume_skb() from hardware interrupt context or with hardware interrupts being disabled. It should use dev_kfree_skb_irq() or dev_consume_skb_irq() instead. The difference between them is free reason, dev_kfree_skb_irq() means the SKB is dropped in error and dev_consume_skb_irq() means the SKB is consumed in normal. In this case, dev_kfree_skb() is called to free and drop the SKB when it's reset, so replace it with dev_kfree_skb_irq(). Compile tested only. Fixes: 43f66a6ce8da ("Add ipw2200 wireless driver.") Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221208143826.2385218-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c index ada6ce32c1f19..df28e4a05e140 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c @@ -3444,7 +3444,7 @@ static void ipw_rx_queue_reset(struct ipw_priv *priv, dma_unmap_single(&priv->pci_dev->dev, rxq->pool[i].dma_addr, IPW_RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); - dev_kfree_skb(rxq->pool[i].skb); + dev_kfree_skb_irq(rxq->pool[i].skb); rxq->pool[i].skb = NULL; } list_add_tail(&rxq->pool[i].list, &rxq->rx_used); -- 2.39.2