From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 509E020F88 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 19:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6F13C433C7; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 19:07:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1689966479; bh=Ggab/Fb4oT0/P/fmRBL97/i9e37dzda968nsBHGSaOE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wBARAQHhgt+/vu63YeF3Bqr5vZ4d9HVLiSDOdgrDEBE7AyQ8mG4re/1AWkiEW+RO1 MGsoFYWJWMrDsXFjtHsv9G6q/IFOOOEexRPvarWxqfN2dxbi0UWqSh4hhVN2Mzh8Ch XUdil2971boZBF9FTJ1rxHkp45IZIyK07bxeUHyo= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Jan Kara , Christian Brauner Subject: [PATCH 5.15 359/532] fs: Establish locking order for unrelated directories Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:04:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20230721160633.936096451@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230721160614.695323302@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230721160614.695323302@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jan Kara commit f23ce757185319886ca80c4864ce5f81ac6cc9e9 upstream. Currently the locking order of inode locks for directories that are not in ancestor relationship is not defined because all operations that needed to lock two directories like this were serialized by sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex. However some filesystems need to lock two subdirectories for RENAME_EXCHANGE operations and for this we need the locking order established even for two tree-unrelated directories. Provide a helper function lock_two_inodes() that establishes lock ordering for any two inodes and use it in lock_two_directories(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Message-Id: <20230601105830.13168-4-jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/inode.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/internal.h | 2 ++ fs/namei.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -1024,6 +1024,48 @@ void discard_new_inode(struct inode *ino EXPORT_SYMBOL(discard_new_inode); /** + * lock_two_inodes - lock two inodes (may be regular files but also dirs) + * + * Lock any non-NULL argument. The caller must make sure that if he is passing + * in two directories, one is not ancestor of the other. Zero, one or two + * objects may be locked by this function. + * + * @inode1: first inode to lock + * @inode2: second inode to lock + * @subclass1: inode lock subclass for the first lock obtained + * @subclass2: inode lock subclass for the second lock obtained + */ +void lock_two_inodes(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2, + unsigned subclass1, unsigned subclass2) +{ + if (!inode1 || !inode2) { + /* + * Make sure @subclass1 will be used for the acquired lock. + * This is not strictly necessary (no current caller cares) but + * let's keep things consistent. + */ + if (!inode1) + swap(inode1, inode2); + goto lock; + } + + /* + * If one object is directory and the other is not, we must make sure + * to lock directory first as the other object may be its child. + */ + if (S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode) == S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode)) { + if (inode1 > inode2) + swap(inode1, inode2); + } else if (!S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode)) + swap(inode1, inode2); +lock: + if (inode1) + inode_lock_nested(inode1, subclass1); + if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1) + inode_lock_nested(inode2, subclass2); +} + +/** * lock_two_nondirectories - take two i_mutexes on non-directory objects * * Lock any non-NULL argument that is not a directory. --- a/fs/internal.h +++ b/fs/internal.h @@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ extern void inode_add_lru(struct inode * int dentry_needs_remove_privs(struct user_namespace *, struct dentry *dentry); bool in_group_or_capable(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, const struct inode *inode, kgid_t gid); +void lock_two_inodes(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2, + unsigned subclass1, unsigned subclass2); /* * fs-writeback.c --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -2984,8 +2984,8 @@ struct dentry *lock_rename(struct dentry return p; } - inode_lock_nested(p1->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT); - inode_lock_nested(p2->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT2); + lock_two_inodes(p1->d_inode, p2->d_inode, + I_MUTEX_PARENT, I_MUTEX_PARENT2); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_rename);