From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92DDB9446 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 21:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A0EEC433C7; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 21:43:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1691963003; bh=ZDQatO0janZUPWiZepG5Vpft0JcKZgIvYCGL/IEyLns=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rm4OwDrLcG9TwYY9J8ptpSMA19aA8B2MdWTGKumqkIVe1X8kFBlIxw8MZVuKeePeM xSVHleT/LJ+xs8E0obj+YKMOldMxOYTv2LZy9kZYrE9Wff1ALzD76JMOBOVv48bVFr VQw0RgDciAc4GEFITal+iRsoaPL+WIYrJ+Q4fiyA= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Andrii Nakryiko , Yonghong Song , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH 5.15 18/89] selftests/bpf: Workaround verification failure for fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 23:19:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20230813211711.311057714@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230813211710.787645394@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230813211710.787645394@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Yonghong Song [ Upstream commit 63d78b7e8ca2d0eb8c687a355fa19d01b6fcc723 ] With latest llvm17, selftest fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code has the following verification failure: 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int connect_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) 0: (bf) r7 = r1 ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R7_w=ctx(off=0,imm=0) 1: (b4) w6 = 0 ; R6_w=0 ; memset(&tuple.ipv4.saddr, 0, sizeof(tuple.ipv4.saddr)); ... ; return do_bind(ctx) ? 1 : 0; 179: (bf) r1 = r7 ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R7=ctx(off=0,imm=0) 180: (85) call pc+147 Func#3 is global and valid. Skipping. 181: R0_w=scalar() 181: (bc) w6 = w0 ; R0_w=scalar() R6_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 182: (05) goto pc-129 ; } 54: (bc) w0 = w6 ; R0_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=scalar(umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 55: (95) exit At program exit the register R0 has value (0x0; 0xffffffff) should have been in (0x0; 0x1) processed 281 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 1 total_states 26 peak_states 26 mark_read 13 -- END PROG LOAD LOG -- libbpf: prog 'connect_v4_prog': failed to load: -22 The corresponding source code: __attribute__ ((noinline)) int do_bind(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) { struct sockaddr_in sa = {}; sa.sin_family = AF_INET; sa.sin_port = bpf_htons(0); sa.sin_addr.s_addr = bpf_htonl(SRC_REWRITE_IP4); if (bpf_bind(ctx, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, sizeof(sa)) != 0) return 0; return 1; } ... SEC("cgroup/connect4") int connect_v4_prog(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) { ... return do_bind(ctx) ? 1 : 0; } Insn 180 is a call to 'do_bind'. The call's return value is also the return value for the program. Since do_bind() returns 0/1, so it is legitimate for compiler to optimize 'return do_bind(ctx) ? 1 : 0' to 'return do_bind(ctx)'. However, such optimization breaks verifier as the return value of 'do_bind()' is marked as any scalar which violates the requirement of prog return value 0/1. There are two ways to fix this problem, (1) changing 'return 1' in do_bind() to e.g. 'return 10' so the compiler has to do 'do_bind(ctx) ? 1 :0', or (2) suggested by Andrii, marking do_bind() with __weak attribute so the compiler cannot make any assumption on do_bind() return value. This patch adopted adding __weak approach which is simpler and more resistant to potential compiler optimizations. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230310012410.2920570-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int _version SEC("version") = 1; -__attribute__ ((noinline)) +__attribute__ ((noinline)) __weak int do_bind(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) { struct sockaddr_in sa = {};