From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C8D16434 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DBA7C433C8; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:26:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1692203209; bh=XBmNXo56o9zWOdDYjFcNbBLRq5ZXa2vRzhhpN3dm3EQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YhdbozxPAhs2Yjhn4jGX9FtyIO1su/3cx8O7NteSl4+NQY/KxUj8plyvENUHsZixj 8tMw05jXKvqkjpj6OQx3ydO1LxY8ogqNzyQ9QbUfwtF3xsr6OWzygcTEPswPS/+ys6 fwathhk3ZlHbfsnzN7xEsMsBBu3TFvig8l9vJH9o= Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 18:26:47 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/149] 6.1.46-rc1 review Message-ID: <2023081631-uproar-tapered-2221@gregkh> References: <20230813211718.757428827@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 07:04:57AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.46 release. > > There are 149 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:16:53 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > Booting with f2fs root file systems still crashes in this release > candidate. Would it make sense to mark f2fs as broken in v6.1.y ? Ick, yeah, let me dig into this next week and figure out what went wrong... greg k-h