From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 156BC7E for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 035FEC433C7; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 11:22:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1693048928; bh=fyswWCvolm2y6M4a91+O6ddbkgFK7oDmD1bgTfuHkRI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QiZw78cJZrox80FpImQplJf7bRThtISkxjvnU+T4bGie45ydhn7zeHyAc8cjxcCmw xH2ClnZJXNkDv9fRtLCPWeyQHkKbcZI7OvshFRB170uoZXGkyUo9BmJvh2HY/9ntHk HZNcmO/QdCFyLk8cdUeZ1eM2cTtbLVt3I3YueX44= Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:22:05 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Conor Dooley Cc: Guenter Roeck , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/135] 5.10.192-rc1 review Message-ID: <2023082633-shininess-sponsor-f747@gregkh> References: <20230824170617.074557800@linuxfoundation.org> <2023082636-postnasal-cobalt-5ab5@gregkh> <20230826-huddle-designed-952a01db6e88@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230826-huddle-designed-952a01db6e88@spud> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 11:38:56AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 12:08:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:24:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:07:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.192 release. > > > > There are 135 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:05:50 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > Testing is not complete, but early feedback: All riscv32 boot tests > > > crash badly with errors such as > > > > > > Starting syslogd: OK > > > Starting klogd: OK > > > /etc/init.d/S02sysctl: line 68: syntax error: EOF in backquote substitution > > > /etc/init.d/S20seedrng: line 33: syntax error: unexpected end of file (expecting ";;") > > > Starting network: /bin/sh: syntax error: unterminated quoted string > > > sed: unmatched '/' > > > /bin/sh: syntax error: unterminated quoted string > > > FAIL > > > /etc/init.d/S55runtest: line 48: syntax error: EOF in backquote substitution > > > > > > This is no longer seen after reverting the following patches. > > > > > > 92609bb3a1f8 riscv: uaccess: Return the number of bytes effectively not copied > > > e06648704417 riscv: lib: uaccess: fix CSR_STATUS SR_SUM bit > > > 20704d763646 riscv: lib: uaccess: fold fixups into body > > > 4f503bad920e riscv: __asm_copy_to-from_user: Optimize unaligned memory access and pipeline stall > > > > Thanks for the review, I'll go drop all of the riscv patches here. > > Really, we shouldn't be adding any of them to any kernels older than > > 5.15 these days as I do not think anyone using that cpu is using those > > older kernels (or at least I sure hope not...) > > I know one of the main cpu IP vendors does run a 5.10 based tree, but > that thing is both an abomination of out-of-tree patches to core arch > code & about 100 releases out of date, therefore not really worth > factoring. Anyone in their right mind should be running something > significantly more recent than 5.10 for riscv. Thanks for the verification. Anyone using such an abomination of a tree, gets their support from the creator of such an abomination :) greg k-h