From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F951170E for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41AC5C433C7; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:53:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1694440385; bh=wwxQMbdfp5zNkhespzU0KeL2VDZDFLACB1K8Gp+pYR0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rudpIffvV+ZgRFUqeJKdMNOEV8kI4OTjJ80nmcX50Lf1vKB5880nKvIFlrojSz8Vq ka8XbLX/BZSL1RPYiV7taQEZJlIeFG6mEm2yJT35E9nD6sBP+Rupfy3TzSYetwpCRY w4pe9j8JTGd6pYxer6UO6CvT+fZNdWPddV7UeRh0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Xu Yang , Frank Li , Will Deacon , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.5 042/739] perf/imx_ddr: dont enable counter0 if none of 4 counters are used Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:37:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20230911134652.286750217@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20230911134650.921299741@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230911134650.921299741@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Xu Yang [ Upstream commit f4e2bd91ddf5e8543cbe7ad80b3fba3d2dc63fa3 ] In current driver, counter0 will be enabled after ddr_perf_pmu_enable() is called even though none of the 4 counters are used. This will cause counter0 continue to count until ddr_perf_pmu_disabled() is called. If pmu is not disabled all the time, the pmu interrupt will be asserted from time to time due to counter0 will overflow and irq handler will clear it. It's not an expected behavior. This patch will not enable counter0 if none of 4 counters are used. Fixes: 9a66d36cc7ac ("drivers/perf: imx_ddr: Add DDR performance counter support to perf") Signed-off-by: Xu Yang Reviewed-by: Frank Li Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811015438.1999307-2-xu.yang_2@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c | 24 +++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c index 5222ba1e79d0e..c684aab407f86 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct ddr_pmu { const struct fsl_ddr_devtype_data *devtype_data; int irq; int id; + int active_counter; }; static ssize_t ddr_perf_identifier_show(struct device *dev, @@ -495,6 +496,10 @@ static void ddr_perf_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags) ddr_perf_counter_enable(pmu, event->attr.config, counter, true); + if (!pmu->active_counter++) + ddr_perf_counter_enable(pmu, EVENT_CYCLES_ID, + EVENT_CYCLES_COUNTER, true); + hwc->state = 0; } @@ -548,6 +553,10 @@ static void ddr_perf_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags) ddr_perf_counter_enable(pmu, event->attr.config, counter, false); ddr_perf_event_update(event); + if (!--pmu->active_counter) + ddr_perf_counter_enable(pmu, EVENT_CYCLES_ID, + EVENT_CYCLES_COUNTER, false); + hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED; } @@ -565,25 +574,10 @@ static void ddr_perf_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags) static void ddr_perf_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu) { - struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu); - - /* enable cycle counter if cycle is not active event list */ - if (ddr_pmu->events[EVENT_CYCLES_COUNTER] == NULL) - ddr_perf_counter_enable(ddr_pmu, - EVENT_CYCLES_ID, - EVENT_CYCLES_COUNTER, - true); } static void ddr_perf_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu) { - struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu); - - if (ddr_pmu->events[EVENT_CYCLES_COUNTER] == NULL) - ddr_perf_counter_enable(ddr_pmu, - EVENT_CYCLES_ID, - EVENT_CYCLES_COUNTER, - false); } static int ddr_perf_init(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, void __iomem *base, -- 2.40.1