From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D641170E for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8317C433C7; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:04:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1694441058; bh=ye+xwRDKggz7Foz+AO/LW7gsSg8xFzSlmcCbejNLZh8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tSCPHGgBfGkYMhh0Xjt3ooVwTlNeBav2/cEsoLGCurOLs5a5+QU8eEPhmlSgO6J43 CjpoPphUvszqt/e/ZzV+KnG8fnc40EGUbI4J5tvERFoO/6XFk89MXiIpMTdUzehxcl isve6DpLypZXpochpFpMryHB5jQehzwte4EUmeuE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20K=C3=B6nig?= , Alex Deucher , Srinivasan Shanmugam , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.5 280/739] drm/amdgpu: Use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:41:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20230911134658.944695081@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20230911134650.921299741@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230911134650.921299741@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Srinivasan Shanmugam [ Upstream commit fc8e55f378cf11f3abe25ec5cd67b6fc5e915a96 ] For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following warning. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf And other style fixes: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line Cc: Christian König Cc: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c index ebeddc9a37e9b..6aa3b1d845abe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ * Returns 0 on success, error on failure. */ int amdgpu_ib_get(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm, - unsigned size, enum amdgpu_ib_pool_type pool_type, + unsigned int size, enum amdgpu_ib_pool_type pool_type, struct amdgpu_ib *ib) { int r; @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void amdgpu_ib_free(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_ib *ib, * a CONST_IB), it will be put on the ring prior to the DE IB. Prior * to SI there was just a DE IB. */ -int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs, +int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int num_ibs, struct amdgpu_ib *ibs, struct amdgpu_job *job, struct dma_fence **f) { @@ -131,16 +131,16 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs, struct amdgpu_ib *ib = &ibs[0]; struct dma_fence *tmp = NULL; bool need_ctx_switch; - unsigned patch_offset = ~0; + unsigned int patch_offset = ~0; struct amdgpu_vm *vm; uint64_t fence_ctx; uint32_t status = 0, alloc_size; - unsigned fence_flags = 0; + unsigned int fence_flags = 0; bool secure, init_shadow; u64 shadow_va, csa_va, gds_va; int vmid = AMDGPU_JOB_GET_VMID(job); - unsigned i; + unsigned int i; int r = 0; bool need_pipe_sync = false; @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs, amdgpu_ring_emit_gfx_shadow(ring, 0, 0, 0, false, 0); if (ring->funcs->init_cond_exec) { - unsigned ce_offset = ~0; + unsigned int ce_offset = ~0; ce_offset = amdgpu_ring_init_cond_exec(ring); if (ce_offset != ~0 && ring->funcs->patch_cond_exec) @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(struct amdgpu_device *adev) { long tmo_gfx, tmo_mm; int r, ret = 0; - unsigned i; + unsigned int i; tmo_mm = tmo_gfx = AMDGPU_IB_TEST_TIMEOUT; if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) { @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ int amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(struct amdgpu_device *adev) /* for CP & SDMA engines since they are scheduled together so * need to make the timeout width enough to cover the time * cost waiting for it coming back under RUNTIME only - */ + */ tmo_gfx = 8 * AMDGPU_IB_TEST_TIMEOUT; } else if (adev->gmc.xgmi.hive_id) { tmo_gfx = AMDGPU_IB_TEST_GFX_XGMI_TIMEOUT; @@ -465,13 +465,13 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_sa_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) { struct amdgpu_device *adev = m->private; - seq_printf(m, "--------------------- DELAYED --------------------- \n"); + seq_puts(m, "--------------------- DELAYED ---------------------\n"); amdgpu_sa_bo_dump_debug_info(&adev->ib_pools[AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DELAYED], m); - seq_printf(m, "-------------------- IMMEDIATE -------------------- \n"); + seq_puts(m, "-------------------- IMMEDIATE --------------------\n"); amdgpu_sa_bo_dump_debug_info(&adev->ib_pools[AMDGPU_IB_POOL_IMMEDIATE], m); - seq_printf(m, "--------------------- DIRECT ---------------------- \n"); + seq_puts(m, "--------------------- DIRECT ----------------------\n"); amdgpu_sa_bo_dump_debug_info(&adev->ib_pools[AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DIRECT], m); return 0; -- 2.40.1