From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FDF9443 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86811C433C8; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:04:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1694520292; bh=c2WM0QebFwkruvvqL++OW0UcOhGNYH/ROgXNJT1LLoc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=v095H48BttzMy8UN6sFIadIbmuGZr8BXHGdlpBazolDN9mRSqexuiCvxBW5dIxIqZ 5CQ4HsYLFxBJ65pfYX9JG4hrnCou4Q+mnQMyyEaGRvMqZNt6tkPWwA9KVylcNKl6uy v3zuyJrrE5oC0B0nSU5RxsD5s2CoSgDmyvYDOjuw= Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:04:49 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Lorenz Bauer Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Kuniyuki Iwashima , Lorenz Bauer , Martin KaFai Lau , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.5 090/739] net: export inet_lookup_reuseport and inet6_lookup_reuseport Message-ID: <2023091237-glandular-feel-9012@gregkh> References: <20230911134650.921299741@linuxfoundation.org> <20230911134653.617660874@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Lorenz Bauer wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I sent the below email to Sasha and stable@ this morning, but I forgot > to CC you and can't find a copy of it on lore. So here goes a copy: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 2:55 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > 6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > This commit is part of the following series > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230720-so-reuseport-v6-0-7021b683cdae@isovalent.com/ > As far as I can tell this was pulled in due to the Fixes tag on patch > 7. I think that tag was misguided, in that the original code > explicitly rejected SO_REUSEPORT sockets so there isn't a bug to fix > here. The SO_REUSEPORT code is quite fiddly, so I'm uneasy about > backporting the change. Could you drop patches 3-8 from 5.15, 6.1, 6.4 > and 6.5 please? Patch 1-2 are good to backport. > > This also means that "net: remove duplicate INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE > of udp[6]_ehashfn" is not required anymore. Thank you for this, I've now dropped all of these from all queues. greg k-h