From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0819753B4 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 19:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6714BC433C8; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 19:33:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1694979211; bh=YTRKT2lssc4vf6w5PMvsc+miR3NV2g++dM5CGV+jIcs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nPQxwq6HAbm50EuUZfMeCv1AsJ5Bp9O9a4IDpQcuXSbtRzeakmIKfEibeweRa1ESW hyjdSDU133FWVAgs97G1cE3J+YD7fs061bxgWWx32wpq+i9cd1c69x+a0pL8XvZEpv LhqxnXrtCH4w5i5pKtPVA5M5KDbaRijWCKsHae0I= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Chengfeng Ye , Davidlohr Bueso , "Martin K. Petersen" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 246/406] scsi: fcoe: Fix potential deadlock on &fip->ctlr_lock Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 21:11:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20230917191107.656163140@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20230917191101.035638219@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230917191101.035638219@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Chengfeng Ye [ Upstream commit 1a1975551943f681772720f639ff42fbaa746212 ] There is a long call chain that &fip->ctlr_lock is acquired by isr fnic_isr_msix_wq_copy() under hard IRQ context. Thus other process context code acquiring the lock should disable IRQ, otherwise deadlock could happen if the IRQ preempts the execution while the lock is held in process context on the same CPU. [ISR] fnic_isr_msix_wq_copy() -> fnic_wq_copy_cmpl_handler() -> fnic_fcpio_cmpl_handler() -> fnic_fcpio_flogi_reg_cmpl_handler() -> fnic_flush_tx() -> fnic_send_frame() -> fcoe_ctlr_els_send() -> spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock) [Process Context] 1. fcoe_ctlr_timer_work() -> fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send() -> spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock) 2. fcoe_ctlr_recv_work() -> fcoe_ctlr_recv_handler() -> fcoe_ctlr_recv_els() -> fcoe_ctlr_announce() -> spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock) 3. fcoe_ctlr_recv_work() -> fcoe_ctlr_recv_handler() -> fcoe_ctlr_recv_els() -> fcoe_ctlr_flogi_retry() -> spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock) 4. -> fcoe_xmit() -> fcoe_ctlr_els_send() -> spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock) spin_lock_bh() is not enough since fnic_isr_msix_wq_copy() is a hardirq. These flaws were found by an experimental static analysis tool I am developing for irq-related deadlock. The patch fix the potential deadlocks by spin_lock_irqsave() to disable hard irq. Fixes: 794d98e77f59 ("[SCSI] libfcoe: retry rejected FLOGI to another FCF if possible") Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230817074708.7509-1-dg573847474@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c index bbc5d6b9be737..a2d60ad2a6835 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c @@ -319,16 +319,17 @@ static void fcoe_ctlr_announce(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip) { struct fcoe_fcf *sel; struct fcoe_fcf *fcf; + unsigned long flags; mutex_lock(&fip->ctlr_mutex); - spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); kfree_skb(fip->flogi_req); fip->flogi_req = NULL; list_for_each_entry(fcf, &fip->fcfs, list) fcf->flogi_sent = 0; - spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); sel = fip->sel_fcf; if (sel && ether_addr_equal(sel->fcf_mac, fip->dest_addr)) @@ -699,6 +700,7 @@ int fcoe_ctlr_els_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip, struct fc_lport *lport, { struct fc_frame *fp; struct fc_frame_header *fh; + unsigned long flags; u16 old_xid; u8 op; u8 mac[ETH_ALEN]; @@ -732,11 +734,11 @@ int fcoe_ctlr_els_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip, struct fc_lport *lport, op = FIP_DT_FLOGI; if (fip->mode == FIP_MODE_VN2VN) break; - spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); kfree_skb(fip->flogi_req); fip->flogi_req = skb; fip->flogi_req_send = 1; - spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); schedule_work(&fip->timer_work); return -EINPROGRESS; case ELS_FDISC: @@ -1713,10 +1715,11 @@ static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send_locked(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip) static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_retry(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip) { struct fcoe_fcf *fcf; + unsigned long flags; int error; mutex_lock(&fip->ctlr_mutex); - spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); LIBFCOE_FIP_DBG(fip, "re-sending FLOGI - reselect\n"); fcf = fcoe_ctlr_select(fip); if (!fcf || fcf->flogi_sent) { @@ -1727,7 +1730,7 @@ static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_retry(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip) fcoe_ctlr_solicit(fip, NULL); error = fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send_locked(fip); } - spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); mutex_unlock(&fip->ctlr_mutex); return error; } @@ -1744,8 +1747,9 @@ static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_retry(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip) static void fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip) { struct fcoe_fcf *fcf; + unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); fcf = fip->sel_fcf; if (!fcf || !fip->flogi_req_send) goto unlock; @@ -1772,7 +1776,7 @@ static void fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip) } else /* XXX */ LIBFCOE_FIP_DBG(fip, "No FCF selected - defer send\n"); unlock: - spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags); } /** -- 2.40.1