From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1DA31A6E for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 12:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A52D6C433CA; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 12:40:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1695213658; bh=7CbOR46xCngiFr39JMpUajZdnvyncOarCi0xAGOKTeg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LLdLjm+mvXuaUbNGoCT4HZ7Z7w15I9se7T0hfOTl5qjh8uXchu7NMXXtsaFeZsSDi igUWGLP+a78OSge2qEjom0BYKB05GIZ1ygYoH8mkJQM0t8Va61YLC7WwVf5V6G8KEb iDJ7HHfg2h0QfoFk0LslUhna5D5zdaMkGUKH/b+0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Tomislav Novak , Catalin Marinas , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Deacon , Sasha Levin , Samuel Gosselin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 317/367] hw_breakpoint: fix single-stepping when using bpf_overflow_handler Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:31:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20230920112906.752355947@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20230920112858.471730572@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20230920112858.471730572@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Tomislav Novak [ Upstream commit d11a69873d9a7435fe6a48531e165ab80a8b1221 ] Arm platforms use is_default_overflow_handler() to determine if the hw_breakpoint code should single-step over the breakpoint trigger or let the custom handler deal with it. Since bpf_overflow_handler() currently isn't recognized as a default handler, attaching a BPF program to a PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT event causes it to keep firing (the instruction triggering the data abort exception is never skipped). For example: # bpftrace -e 'watchpoint:0x10000:4:w { print("hit") }' -c ./test Attaching 1 probe... hit hit [...] ^C (./test performs a single 4-byte store to 0x10000) This patch replaces the check with uses_default_overflow_handler(), which accounts for the bpf_overflow_handler() case by also testing if one of the perf_event_output functions gets invoked indirectly, via orig_default_handler. Signed-off-by: Tomislav Novak Tested-by: Samuel Gosselin # arm64 Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220923203644.2731604-1-tnovak@fb.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605191923.1219974-1-tnovak@meta.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 8 ++++---- arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/perf_event.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index b06d9ea07c846..a69dd64a84017 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp, hw->address &= ~alignment_mask; hw->ctrl.len <<= offset; - if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp)) { + if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp)) { /* * Mismatch breakpoints are required for single-stepping * breakpoints. @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, * Otherwise, insert a temporary mismatch breakpoint so that * we can single-step over the watchpoint trigger. */ - if (!is_default_overflow_handler(wp)) + if (!uses_default_overflow_handler(wp)) continue; step: enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs)); @@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, info->trigger = addr; pr_debug("watchpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", info->trigger); perf_bp_event(wp, regs); - if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp)) + if (uses_default_overflow_handler(wp)) enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs)); } @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs) info->trigger = addr; pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr); perf_bp_event(bp, regs); - if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp)) + if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp)) enable_single_step(bp, addr); goto unlock; } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index b4a1607958246..534578eba556e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unused, unsigned int esr, perf_bp_event(bp, regs); /* Do we need to handle the stepping? */ - if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp)) + if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp)) step = 1; unlock: rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static u64 get_distance_from_watchpoint(unsigned long addr, u64 val, static int watchpoint_report(struct perf_event *wp, unsigned long addr, struct pt_regs *regs) { - int step = is_default_overflow_handler(wp); + int step = uses_default_overflow_handler(wp); struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(wp); info->trigger = addr; diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index b7ac395513c0f..c99e2f851d312 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1018,15 +1018,31 @@ extern int perf_event_output(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs); static inline bool -is_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event) +__is_default_overflow_handler(perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler) { - if (likely(event->overflow_handler == perf_event_output_forward)) + if (likely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_forward)) return true; - if (unlikely(event->overflow_handler == perf_event_output_backward)) + if (unlikely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_backward)) return true; return false; } +#define is_default_overflow_handler(event) \ + __is_default_overflow_handler((event)->overflow_handler) + +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL +static inline bool uses_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event) +{ + if (likely(is_default_overflow_handler(event))) + return true; + + return __is_default_overflow_handler(event->orig_overflow_handler); +} +#else +#define uses_default_overflow_handler(event) \ + is_default_overflow_handler(event) +#endif + extern void perf_event_header__init_id(struct perf_event_header *header, struct perf_sample_data *data, -- 2.40.1