From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D141915AE8; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FAEDC433C7; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:16:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1695208564; bh=lnb0O1ksQMJ7rJw1NAKO+dUYTXlWkz3GfIFHZ4hjhYw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hRpFtbRooXyjFa0r5RNeNmIgeYTw6ZeBzweQfv2VXCt+CXluRcoGptjDCBFLqGNQE rI+uyvPzuwHnB+vjJow0Oh53grNRxT8JIvmHwWR1+UR7lH/XBoMhaL/M67wMqmAUSo ruPUpZGkpO0u7KjxmPUYyEZFa/aVb7nxkoxappq4= Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:16:02 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Michal Hocko Cc: Jeremi Piotrowski , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Shakeel Butt , Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, mathieu.tortuyaux@gmail.com Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Re: [PATCH 6.1 033/219] memcg: drop kmem.limit_in_bytes Message-ID: <2023092016-shield-confused-0e12@gregkh> References: <20230917191040.964416434@linuxfoundation.org> <20230917191042.204185566@linuxfoundation.org> <20230920081101.GA12096@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> <2023092032-applied-gave-0bff@gregkh> <76525b1a-6857-434d-86ee-3c2ff4db0e4c@linux.microsoft.com> <2023092044-porthole-impeding-e539@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:08:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 20-09-23 12:45:08, Greg KH wrote: > [...] > > Ok, then we should revert this, I'll go drop it in the stable trees, it > > should also be reverted in Linus's tree too. > > A simple revert would break other users as noted in other response so > wait with sending reverts to Linus before we agreen on the least painful > solution. A revert should cause the systems that stopped working to start working again, so I'll keep the revert in the stable trees and wait for you to work out the real solution in Linus's tree and then backport all of them as needed. thanks, greg k-h