From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD10A4174B for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A752CC433C8; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:17:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1695399456; bh=v9pEskjE+0c2tPAWg+Pp+aOUSYrgxygS40O3R7dgaS0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lPUXQ4790yIgIJtRy7iD0z7rgoB38scUYJWhqhAkzaBnmLb/u3ahsAKtNuGwPTpTL QhZH6ngmp0IaNnKqueUhFpr1FgX/Cgu+7GXz2TDPx2679H+5UXtyD+5ZnsdCq9pdkk +/+Lr2QjCsxmbZ52wlsqcUG6j0tF5O8mmEwlntEs= Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:17:25 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Rob Clark Cc: Guenter Roeck , Jon Hunter , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/139] 6.1.55-rc1 review Message-ID: <2023092216-poser-nickname-b882@gregkh> References: <20230920112835.549467415@linuxfoundation.org> <79a96d41-1b79-51b4-fda0-743b853213b9@nvidia.com> <7e0355bd-64cd-f6c2-b720-e4643579078c@nvidia.com> <53c9f81e-55b9-b8bb-7821-cb124780d4c0@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 08:00:31AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 7:52 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On 9/22/23 05:31, Jon Hunter wrote: > > > > > > On 22/09/2023 10:45, Jon Hunter wrote: > > >> Hi Greg, > > >> > > >> On 20/09/2023 12:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.55 release. > > >>> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > >>> let me know. > > >>> > > >>> Responses should be made by Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:28:09 +0000. > > >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. > > >>> > > >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.55-rc1.gz > > >>> or in the git tree and branch at: > > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > >>> and the diffstat can be found below. > > >>> > > >>> thanks, > > >>> > > >>> greg k-h > > >> > > >> I am seeing some suspend failures with this update ... > > >> > > >> Test results for stable-v6.1: > > >> 11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail > > >> 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail > > >> 130 tests: 124 pass, 6 fail > > >> > > >> Linux version: 6.1.55-rc1-gd5ace918366e > > >> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, > > >> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, > > >> tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, > > >> tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04 > > >> > > >> Test failures: tegra124-jetson-tk1: pm-system-suspend.sh > > >> tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh > > >> tegra20-ventana: pm-system-suspend.sh > > >> tegra30-cardhu-a04: pm-system-suspend.sh > > >> > > >> Bisect is underway. > > > > > > > > > Bisect for this issue is also pointing to ... > > > > > > Rob Clark > > > interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim > > > > > > Looks like all the Tegra issues are related to this. > > > > > > > This isn't surprising because upstream commit 136191703038 ("interconnect: Teach > > lockdep about icc_bw_lock order") silently fixes it without Fixes: tag. If you > > look into that patch you'll see that the the missing call to mutex_unlock() is > > added to icc_sync_state(). > > Oh, indeed, it looks like that hunk ended up in the wrong commit, and > I didn't notice because both were merged at the same time Thanks, I've queued that fix up now as well. greg k-h