From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A3D1D523 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65669C433C8; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:07:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1696442843; bh=1UfanMqkIeHoii9Faw4SfAK36oo6ju//IRctog4if10=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CUhBMglOKiABSYjVxXDT7uMkcRnH+8HE1YIZYFF9xuYaahxGFkZSfgGIuAf8Xmlcw TBjqSFCwM4wcMq12MnZNwB5nHsJHuWXGjDwmrLOOFEkooe3ZP5BmBtWZ0k5CSz/VCh 34zNo/WRaI1/Cc66qDXmJ6/D2hqXwVroZCSbTQFI= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Qu Wenruo , Filipe Manana , David Sterba , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.15 121/183] btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:55:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20231004175209.023263043@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20231004175203.943277832@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231004175203.943277832@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Filipe Manana [ Upstream commit 91bfe3104b8db0310f76f2dcb6aacef24c889366 ] If we fail to add a delayed dir index item because there's already another item with the same index number, we print an error message (and then BUG). However that message isn't very helpful to debug anything because we don't know what's the index number and what are the values of index counters in the inode and its delayed inode (index_cnt fields of struct btrfs_inode and struct btrfs_delayed_node). So update the error message to include the index number and counters. We actually had a recent case where this issue was hit by a syzbot report (see the link below). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index e6872d65c0e25..fd951aeaeac5a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1401,9 +1401,10 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_insertion_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); if (unlikely(ret)) { btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, - "err add delayed dir index item(name: %.*s) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: %llu, inode id: %llu, errno: %d)", - name_len, name, delayed_node->root->root_key.objectid, - delayed_node->inode_id, ret); +"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", + name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), + delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, + delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); BUG(); } mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); -- 2.40.1