From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2471D546 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0A83C433C8; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:10:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1696443040; bh=AU3YEf5FAn9ClojwdDTWH11yMdRnUZ+Qs0BFJW2AwIU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GxvvvgLziexbmRehn4gYGdeOfjYm19uW1z9rGduzm7xKRTsJ+lWHdP5zSgZ5K+pXO SQIfgMGDKOhNwiZ1kRZW8iLl6Imnc7dwrdDYlSG39cgPKJ08AFWlJn6BfvMhn8vsjE 5pHUYPTMOeGsxVf3Y76t6q/LtA+NgyLrwt0IH4VQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Qu Wenruo , Filipe Manana , David Sterba , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1 015/259] btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:53:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20231004175218.123414102@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20231004175217.404851126@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231004175217.404851126@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Filipe Manana [ Upstream commit 91bfe3104b8db0310f76f2dcb6aacef24c889366 ] If we fail to add a delayed dir index item because there's already another item with the same index number, we print an error message (and then BUG). However that message isn't very helpful to debug anything because we don't know what's the index number and what are the values of index counters in the inode and its delayed inode (index_cnt fields of struct btrfs_inode and struct btrfs_delayed_node). So update the error message to include the index number and counters. We actually had a recent case where this issue was hit by a syzbot report (see the link below). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Stable-dep-of: 2c58c3931ede ("btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index d2cbb7733c7d6..34e843460e4db 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1506,9 +1506,10 @@ int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item); if (unlikely(ret)) { btrfs_err(trans->fs_info, - "err add delayed dir index item(name: %.*s) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: %llu, inode id: %llu, errno: %d)", - name_len, name, delayed_node->root->root_key.objectid, - delayed_node->inode_id, ret); +"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d", + name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root), + delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt, + delayed_node->index_cnt, ret); BUG(); } mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex); -- 2.40.1