From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D031D68D for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="dE2wT3KC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21431C433C8; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:18:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1696443506; bh=6iT368qQvXlNRRqGW6aMjzLdqiVeaD3MLhYzhCFq5VY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dE2wT3KCU8N82F5j/Iiz6Cg0s20axZxacnR6fWJolThoQSxNOhO04ppsJm4gD74uT GbKoD6WIyOTLBTUoWWYoJXD1IUd79+N8am5E3TOCw6pnyOCFX8ZydwIl5m2xHOY7W5 uoi5LhIKXXMltYSrhDNXrCG17XAosOeJI48LlkdY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Peter Ujfalusi , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Takashi Iwai , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1 180/259] ALSA: hda: intel-sdw-acpi: Use u8 type for link index Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:55:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20231004175225.555749682@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20231004175217.404851126@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231004175217.404851126@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Ujfalusi [ Upstream commit 485ddd519fbd89a9d9ac4b02be489e03cbbeebba ] Use consistently u8 for sdw link index. The id is limited to 4, u8 is adequate in size to store it. This change will also fixes the following compiler warning/error (W=1): sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c: In function ‘sdw_intel_acpi_scan’: sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c:34:35: error: ‘-subproperties’ directive output may be truncated writing 14 bytes into a region of size between 7 and 17 [-Werror=format-truncation=] 34 | "mipi-sdw-link-%d-subproperties", i); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In function ‘is_link_enabled’, inlined from ‘sdw_intel_scan_controller’ at sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c:106:8, inlined from ‘sdw_intel_acpi_scan’ at sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c:180:9: sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c:33:9: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 30 and 40 bytes into a destination of size 32 33 | snprintf(name, sizeof(name), | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 34 | "mipi-sdw-link-%d-subproperties", i); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors The warnings got brought to light by a recent patch upstream: commit 6d4ab2e97dcf ("extrawarn: enable format and stringop overflow warnings in W=1") Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912162617.29178-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c b/sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c index 5cb92f7ccbcac..b57d72ea4503f 100644 --- a/sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c +++ b/sound/hda/intel-sdw-acpi.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static int ctrl_link_mask; module_param_named(sdw_link_mask, ctrl_link_mask, int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(sdw_link_mask, "Intel link mask (one bit per link)"); -static bool is_link_enabled(struct fwnode_handle *fw_node, int i) +static bool is_link_enabled(struct fwnode_handle *fw_node, u8 idx) { struct fwnode_handle *link; char name[32]; @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static bool is_link_enabled(struct fwnode_handle *fw_node, int i) /* Find master handle */ snprintf(name, sizeof(name), - "mipi-sdw-link-%d-subproperties", i); + "mipi-sdw-link-%hhu-subproperties", idx); link = fwnode_get_named_child_node(fw_node, name); if (!link) @@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static int sdw_intel_scan_controller(struct sdw_intel_acpi_info *info) { struct acpi_device *adev = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(info->handle); - int ret, i; - u8 count; + u8 count, i; + int ret; if (!adev) return -EINVAL; -- 2.40.1