From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958C0266B7 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="pw4Di8NB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D69AFC433C8; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:49:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1697467755; bh=VzLtqRqUP5mnz63e2uZ8sM32d1Zgr/dYpqsfSvKDUI4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pw4Di8NBaaqTSwSVEGUcPJf6WMZyEQz1ACSWtWLrHjmNBYf02xlia+qPBOErdRbEt voAWJL8njTPMTkQET2VxmLeJIv8hPZgnIdrN+yCeV3irS5giu4F0DPiVK3XYAiGWnz 9EJtF+9SOAvrkGAXawMDh4Pfa37jW8HSwCOTcjt4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Moshe Shemesh , Jiri Pirko , Przemek Kitszel , Jakub Kicinski , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.5 059/191] devlink: Hold devlink lock on health reporter dump get Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 10:40:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20231016084016.779892459@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20231016084015.400031271@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231016084015.400031271@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Moshe Shemesh [ Upstream commit aba0e909dc20eceb1de985474af459f82e7b0b82 ] Devlink health dump get callback should take devlink lock as any other devlink callback. Otherwise, since devlink_mutex was removed, this callback is not protected from a race of the reporter being destroyed while handling the callback. Add devlink lock to the callback and to any call for devlink_health_do_dump(). This should be safe as non of the drivers dump callback implementation takes devlink lock. As devlink lock is added to any callback of dump, the reporter dump_lock is now redundant and can be removed. Fixes: d3efc2a6a6d8 ("net: devlink: remove devlink_mutex") Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1696510216-189379-1-git-send-email-moshe@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/devlink/health.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/devlink/health.c b/net/devlink/health.c index 194340a8bb863..8c6a2e5140d4d 100644 --- a/net/devlink/health.c +++ b/net/devlink/health.c @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ struct devlink_health_reporter { struct devlink *devlink; struct devlink_port *devlink_port; struct devlink_fmsg *dump_fmsg; - struct mutex dump_lock; /* lock parallel read/write from dump buffers */ u64 graceful_period; bool auto_recover; bool auto_dump; @@ -125,7 +124,6 @@ __devlink_health_reporter_create(struct devlink *devlink, reporter->graceful_period = graceful_period; reporter->auto_recover = !!ops->recover; reporter->auto_dump = !!ops->dump; - mutex_init(&reporter->dump_lock); return reporter; } @@ -226,7 +224,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_health_reporter_create); static void devlink_health_reporter_free(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter) { - mutex_destroy(&reporter->dump_lock); if (reporter->dump_fmsg) devlink_fmsg_free(reporter->dump_fmsg); kfree(reporter); @@ -609,10 +606,10 @@ int devlink_health_report(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter, } if (reporter->auto_dump) { - mutex_lock(&reporter->dump_lock); + devl_lock(devlink); /* store current dump of current error, for later analysis */ devlink_health_do_dump(reporter, priv_ctx, NULL); - mutex_unlock(&reporter->dump_lock); + devl_unlock(devlink); } if (!reporter->auto_recover) @@ -1246,7 +1243,7 @@ int devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_diagnose_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, } static struct devlink_health_reporter * -devlink_health_reporter_get_from_cb(struct netlink_callback *cb) +devlink_health_reporter_get_from_cb_lock(struct netlink_callback *cb) { const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(cb); struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter; @@ -1256,10 +1253,12 @@ devlink_health_reporter_get_from_cb(struct netlink_callback *cb) devlink = devlink_get_from_attrs_lock(sock_net(cb->skb->sk), attrs); if (IS_ERR(devlink)) return NULL; - devl_unlock(devlink); reporter = devlink_health_reporter_get_from_attrs(devlink, attrs); - devlink_put(devlink); + if (!reporter) { + devl_unlock(devlink); + devlink_put(devlink); + } return reporter; } @@ -1268,16 +1267,20 @@ int devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_dump_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, { struct devlink_nl_dump_state *state = devlink_dump_state(cb); struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter; + struct devlink *devlink; int err; - reporter = devlink_health_reporter_get_from_cb(cb); + reporter = devlink_health_reporter_get_from_cb_lock(cb); if (!reporter) return -EINVAL; - if (!reporter->ops->dump) + devlink = reporter->devlink; + if (!reporter->ops->dump) { + devl_unlock(devlink); + devlink_put(devlink); return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } - mutex_lock(&reporter->dump_lock); if (!state->idx) { err = devlink_health_do_dump(reporter, NULL, cb->extack); if (err) @@ -1293,7 +1296,8 @@ int devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_dump_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, err = devlink_fmsg_dumpit(reporter->dump_fmsg, skb, cb, DEVLINK_CMD_HEALTH_REPORTER_DUMP_GET); unlock: - mutex_unlock(&reporter->dump_lock); + devl_unlock(devlink); + devlink_put(devlink); return err; } @@ -1310,9 +1314,7 @@ int devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_dump_clear_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, if (!reporter->ops->dump) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - mutex_lock(&reporter->dump_lock); devlink_health_dump_clear(reporter); - mutex_unlock(&reporter->dump_lock); return 0; } -- 2.40.1