From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 399621804F for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="zExaxDOf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AED98C433C9; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:51:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1698061900; bh=wFAIbEjHOYVoGrRWc7kPHGgB5ZEjOR7V6tS3CyD9F50=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=zExaxDOfkLe16VXzJpqPGS0bptEAsbD4JJhe7Ne3l8EYJWdYuIOuL2E5h6KK6vIgR 1EDpR6H7nmDot+CV2SBeEalDfXS1eGYgJh/x9RBn7Cr4QVAysoO+P40NTj3zbiaj5U 6yr+uEFyCCeTsVqtBtyxJLP/hH3RIqhZIrzuWv1c= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Zhang Changzhong , Xin Long , Steffen Klassert , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 202/202] xfrm6: fix inet6_dev refcount underflow problem Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:58:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20231023104832.312700481@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20231023104826.569169691@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231023104826.569169691@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Zhang Changzhong [ Upstream commit cc9b364bb1d58d3dae270c7a931a8cc717dc2b3b ] There are race conditions that may lead to inet6_dev refcount underflow in xfrm6_dst_destroy() and rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev(). One of the refcount underflow bugs is shown below: (cpu 1) | (cpu 2) xfrm6_dst_destroy() | ... | in6_dev_put() | | rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev() ... | ... | in6_dev_put() rt6_uncached_list_del() | ... ... | xfrm6_dst_destroy() calls rt6_uncached_list_del() after in6_dev_put(), so rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev() has a chance to call in6_dev_put() again for the same inet6_dev. Fix it by moving in6_dev_put() after rt6_uncached_list_del() in xfrm6_dst_destroy(). Fixes: 510c321b5571 ("xfrm: reuse uncached_list to track xdsts") Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong Reviewed-by: Xin Long Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c @@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ static void xfrm6_dst_destroy(struct dst { struct xfrm_dst *xdst = (struct xfrm_dst *)dst; - if (likely(xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev)) - in6_dev_put(xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev); dst_destroy_metrics_generic(dst); if (xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_uncached_list) rt6_uncached_list_del(&xdst->u.rt6); + if (likely(xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev)) + in6_dev_put(xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev); xfrm_dst_destroy(xdst); }