From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5507E200A5 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="2rsdOhHI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C65C2C433C7; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:06:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1699275981; bh=OFjUQ7tPlqOG8B5g+dImc3pXmBCFSlfa+h/pcdDV84E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=2rsdOhHIgckZBK1ZBNLTotW/qZoYJ9A1eAWTxR0rETz/6UN/26aasNJUrnrqvTHyX rkIERDYqfZXHPCF+p4IE0/z/FNok4WSCjzhnJ42rB9ed6fEDTPDqE1JQ5M8L6SZJ7A D/8cmds5MVTiFc1rsh9xQ32hdMNevHd/KGwp4+h0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot , Dan Carpenter , Kuninori Morimoto , Mark Brown , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 29/48] ASoC: simple-card: fixup asoc_simple_probe() error handling Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:03:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20231106130258.860021281@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20231106130257.862199836@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231106130257.862199836@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kuninori Morimoto [ Upstream commit 41bae58df411f9accf01ea660730649b2fab1dab ] asoc_simple_probe() is used for both "DT probe" (A) and "platform probe" (B). It uses "goto err" when error case, but it is not needed for "platform probe" case (B). Thus it is using "return" directly there. static int asoc_simple_probe(...) { ^ if (...) { | ... (A) if (ret < 0) | goto err; v } else { ^ ... | if (ret < 0) (B) return -Exxx; v } ... ^ if (ret < 0) (C) goto err; v ... err: (D) simple_util_clean_reference(card); return ret; } Both case are using (C) part, and it calls (D) when err case. But (D) will do nothing for (B) case. Because of these behavior, current code itself is not wrong, but is confusable, and more, static analyzing tool will warning on (B) part (should use goto err). To avoid static analyzing tool warning, this patch uses "goto err" on (B) part. Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o7hy7mlh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c index 6959a74a6f491..c5db2d9d44edd 100644 --- a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c +++ b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c @@ -441,10 +441,12 @@ static int asoc_simple_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } else { struct asoc_simple_card_info *cinfo; + ret = -EINVAL; + cinfo = dev->platform_data; if (!cinfo) { dev_err(dev, "no info for asoc-simple-card\n"); - return -EINVAL; + goto err; } if (!cinfo->name || @@ -453,7 +455,7 @@ static int asoc_simple_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) !cinfo->platform || !cinfo->cpu_dai.name) { dev_err(dev, "insufficient asoc_simple_card_info settings\n"); - return -EINVAL; + goto err; } card->name = (cinfo->card) ? cinfo->card : cinfo->name; -- 2.42.0