From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 332E1200A5 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="0DcYCXBf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CBBEC433C7; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:10:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1699276252; bh=v9A2op2SRo4Zbq19D7OS5ntnKgJbcpwaXPMs0hCskiw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0DcYCXBfRElqzuscHK63zVInGILyq9Y23VMTxGkh+iK6ffdh1DoEdJItYyQucW0nx l2qJJR0UVXWiZOPe0QqRqfvGSxWnDFGHsTHX9qqfSsx8gKTo9Hyrr2PX+bE1rhgNt7 NT9+MiWRzavIOrK16dgQKIupsBRBMJIqWkNFeFAo= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot , Dan Carpenter , Kuninori Morimoto , Mark Brown , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 42/61] ASoC: simple-card: fixup asoc_simple_probe() error handling Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:03:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20231106130301.065741728@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 In-Reply-To: <20231106130259.573843228@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20231106130259.573843228@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kuninori Morimoto [ Upstream commit 41bae58df411f9accf01ea660730649b2fab1dab ] asoc_simple_probe() is used for both "DT probe" (A) and "platform probe" (B). It uses "goto err" when error case, but it is not needed for "platform probe" case (B). Thus it is using "return" directly there. static int asoc_simple_probe(...) { ^ if (...) { | ... (A) if (ret < 0) | goto err; v } else { ^ ... | if (ret < 0) (B) return -Exxx; v } ... ^ if (ret < 0) (C) goto err; v ... err: (D) simple_util_clean_reference(card); return ret; } Both case are using (C) part, and it calls (D) when err case. But (D) will do nothing for (B) case. Because of these behavior, current code itself is not wrong, but is confusable, and more, static analyzing tool will warning on (B) part (should use goto err). To avoid static analyzing tool warning, this patch uses "goto err" on (B) part. Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o7hy7mlh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c index 64bf3560c1d1c..7567ee380283e 100644 --- a/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c +++ b/sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c @@ -404,10 +404,12 @@ static int asoc_simple_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } else { struct asoc_simple_card_info *cinfo; + ret = -EINVAL; + cinfo = dev->platform_data; if (!cinfo) { dev_err(dev, "no info for asoc-simple-card\n"); - return -EINVAL; + goto err; } if (!cinfo->name || @@ -416,7 +418,7 @@ static int asoc_simple_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) !cinfo->platform || !cinfo->cpu_dai.name) { dev_err(dev, "insufficient asoc_simple_card_info settings\n"); - return -EINVAL; + goto err; } card->name = (cinfo->card) ? cinfo->card : cinfo->name; -- 2.42.0