From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9CE5DF1F; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="yEkZ70v4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F08B9C433C7; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:55:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1702382123; bh=ELkMM3xL8H6CR/+VuM2URI6u+FZWIT3tz2dGjfDVmtY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yEkZ70v4HQPvJ4mjAZ2LGFeiDgGbm/hcMWhps260aLGNJzoQJmGybkqfTvclnskK2 w8yV9r7Ng4eJ4odjOqFyv1lOIcDeWcB/V8X0TfTh43OT/BFPEM+p5kUgdRB/aYP0Sw HW/atx8BAYSue1yklfCTmGE6eRGENF2vB3itO1No= Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 12:55:21 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/141] 5.15.143-rc1 review Message-ID: <2023121254-reoccur-shorty-cfb2@gregkh> References: <20231211182026.503492284@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:38:39PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote: > Hello! > > On 11/12/23 12:20 p. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.143 release. > > There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:19:59 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.143-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > We're seeing new warnings with GCC-8 and failures with GCC-12 on x86/i386: > > -----8<----- > In file included from /builds/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c:2291: > /builds/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c: In function '__igt_ctx_sseu': > /builds/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c:1284:9: error: left shift of negative value [-Werror=shift-negative-value] > ~(~0 << (hweight32(engine->sseu.subslice_mask) / 2)); > ^~ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.o] Error 1 > /builds/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c: In function 'get_default_sseu_config': > /builds/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:2817:9: error: left shift of negative value [-Werror=shift-negative-value] > ~(~0 << (hweight8(out_sseu->subslice_mask) / 2)); > ^~ > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.o] Error 1 > ----->8----- > > Bisection points to: > > commit 09ebdc1b3dfacc275d5eec3f1dcf632f18bbf5a8 > Author: Arnd Bergmann > Date: Tue Mar 8 22:56:14 2022 +0100 > > Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11 > [ Upstream commit e8c07082a810fbb9db303a2b66b66b8d7e588b53 ] > > > For GCC-12 it's allmodconfig failing, for GCC-8 it's defconfig (i386_defconfig, x86_64_defconfig) just reporting new warnings. > > Some reproducers: > > tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig x86_64_defconfig > > tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-12 --kconfig allmodconfig > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Ok, let me go drop this change and fix up the original commit that required this language change to happen as we aren't quite ready for it yet... thanks, greg k-h