From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, masahiroy@kernel.org, nicolas@fjasle.eu,
andy.chiu@sifive.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: Fix CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH with tip of tree LLVM
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 01:03:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240127090310.GF11935@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125-fix-riscv-option-arch-llvm-18-v1-0-390ac9cc3cd0@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Eric reported that builds of LLVM with [1] (close to tip of tree) have
> CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH=n because the test for expected failure on
> invalid input has started succeeding.
>
> This Kconfig test was added because '.option arch' only causes an
> assembler warning when it is unsupported, rather than a hard error,
> which is what users of as-instr expect when something is unsupported.
>
> This can be resolved by turning assembler warnings into errors with
> '-Wa,--fatal-warnings' like we do with the compiler with '-Werror',
> which is what the first patch does. The second patch removes the invalid
> test, as the valid test is good enough with fatal warnings.
>
> I have diffed several configurations for the different architectures
> that use as-instr and I have found no issues.
>
> I think this could go in through either the kbuild or RISC-V tree with
> sufficient acks but I will let them fight over who takes it :)
>
> [1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ac9fe69f70a2b3541266daedbaaa7dc9c007a2a
>
> ---
> Nathan Chancellor (2):
> kbuild: Add -Wa,--fatal-warnings to as-instr invocation
> RISC-V: Drop invalid test from CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH
>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 -
> scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +-
> scripts/Makefile.compiler | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Looks good,
Tested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Unfortunately another LLVM commit just broke TOOLCHAIN_HAS_VECTOR_CRYPTO, so
I've sent out a patch to fix that too...
But with all the fixes applied it works again.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-27 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 17:32 [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: Fix CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH with tip of tree LLVM Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Add -Wa,--fatal-warnings to as-instr invocation Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-25 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: Drop invalid test from CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-27 9:03 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-01-28 2:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: Fix CONFIG_AS_HAS_OPTION_ARCH with tip of tree LLVM Andy Chiu
2024-01-29 16:34 ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-30 13:15 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-02-21 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240127090310.GF11935@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).