From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, morbo@google.com,
justinstitt@google.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] s390/boot: Workaround current 'llvm-objdump -t -j ...' behavior
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:44:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240220-s390-work-around-llvm-objdump-t-j-v1-1-47bb0366a831@kernel.org> (raw)
When building with OBJDUMP=llvm-objdump, there are a series of warnings
from the section comparisons that arch/s390/boot/Makefile performs
between vmlinux and arch/s390/boot/vmlinux:
llvm-objdump: warning: section '.boot.preserved.data' mentioned in a -j/--section option, but not found in any input file
llvm-objdump: warning: section '.boot.data' mentioned in a -j/--section option, but not found in any input file
llvm-objdump: warning: section '.boot.preserved.data' mentioned in a -j/--section option, but not found in any input file
llvm-objdump: warning: section '.boot.data' mentioned in a -j/--section option, but not found in any input file
The warning is a little misleading, as these sections do exist in the
input files. It is really pointing out that llvm-objdump does not match
GNU objdump's behavior of respecting '-j' / '--section' in combination
with '-t' / '--syms':
$ s390x-linux-gnu-objdump -t -j .boot.data vmlinux.full
vmlinux.full: file format elf64-s390
SYMBOL TABLE:
0000000001951000 l O .boot.data 0000000000003000 sclp_info_sccb
00000000019550e0 l O .boot.data 0000000000000001 sclp_info_sccb_valid
00000000019550e2 g O .boot.data 0000000000001000 early_command_line
...
$ llvm-objdump -t -j .boot.data vmlinux.full
vmlinux.full: file format elf64-s390
SYMBOL TABLE:
0000000000100040 l O .text 0000000000000010 dw_psw
0000000000000000 l df *ABS* 0000000000000000 main.c
00000000001001b0 l F .text 00000000000000c6 trace_event_raw_event_initcall_level
0000000000100280 l F .text 0000000000000100 perf_trace_initcall_level
...
It may be possible to change llvm-objdump's behavior to match GNU
objdump's behavior but the difficulty of that task has not yet been
explored. The combination of '$(OBJDUMP) -t -j' is not common in the
kernel tree on a whole, so workaround this tool difference by grepping
for the sections in the full symbol table output in a similar manner to
the sed invocation. This results in no visible change for GNU objdump
users while fixing the warnings for OBJDUMP=llvm-objdump, further
enabling use of LLVM=1 for ARCH=s390 with versions of LLVM that have
support for s390 in ld.lld and llvm-objcopy.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/20240219113248.16287-C-hca@linux.ibm.com/
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/859
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
s390 llvm-objcopy support may be backported to LLVM 18.1.0 in time for
the final release.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82324
s390 ld.lld has already made it into release/18.x:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0a44c3792a6ff799df5f100670d7e19d1bc49f03
If the objcopy change makes 18.1.0 final, features + this change should
build cleanly with LLVM 18.1.0+ using LLVM=1 :)
---
arch/s390/boot/Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/Makefile b/arch/s390/boot/Makefile
index aecafabc2054..294f08a8811a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/boot/Makefile
+++ b/arch/s390/boot/Makefile
@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ clean-files += vmlinux.map
quiet_cmd_section_cmp = SECTCMP $*
define cmd_section_cmp
- s1=`$(OBJDUMP) -t -j "$*" "$<" | sort | \
+ s1=`$(OBJDUMP) -t "$<" | grep "\s$*\s\+" | sort | \
sed -n "/0000000000000000/! s/.*\s$*\s\+//p" | sha256sum`; \
- s2=`$(OBJDUMP) -t -j "$*" "$(word 2,$^)" | sort | \
+ s2=`$(OBJDUMP) -t "$(word 2,$^)" | grep "\s$*\s\+" | sort | \
sed -n "/0000000000000000/! s/.*\s$*\s\+//p" | sha256sum`; \
if [ "$$s1" != "$$s2" ]; then \
echo "error: section $* differs between $< and $(word 2,$^)" >&2; \
---
base-commit: 778666df60f0d96f215e33e27448de47a2207fb3
change-id: 20240220-s390-work-around-llvm-objdump-t-j-bf8dcdc4f291
Best regards,
--
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 20:44 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-02-21 9:16 ` [PATCH] s390/boot: Workaround current 'llvm-objdump -t -j ...' behavior Heiko Carstens
2024-02-21 16:48 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240220-s390-work-around-llvm-objdump-t-j-v1-1-47bb0366a831@kernel.org \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).