From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4773BB20; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708503147; cv=none; b=T0U9+0NOE2ZH9hxve2iNpvOIPoKtCsEkhBEgUry08qulDKSZBvEaeXm3TlWfqOBf19yTJZYgCrOq3Hlz3mrbquMWd3RESJw9d6wVb+AzD/vU0Tzb4UWWqJ8iPLqPZrj+XgLBmgRe7jryvk3OtHB6/LVgtgWOQV4dWhfHcimQ2+g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708503147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tF9us0osjA8UAzi6uxg3WrpUIErIZ2KZwm0EljYWe74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FU9iLGNdKWfwJg4GsLnye/afhnhHprEmqbALIg5kN43queTInKHcKd9Yz8O76/NbJ+0cvJtb2h5J+VCOSHZWNAw+a69Gp7qel3/YeLb98pNDfpuOua/1I7Ca9c3E8TS++3LrDXJsXkcnsl6mJ6MIaDSuTiT4NZ/m/0WY4c2haxc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=iAG/Kaed; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="iAG/Kaed" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6962EC433C7; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:12:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1708503147; bh=tF9us0osjA8UAzi6uxg3WrpUIErIZ2KZwm0EljYWe74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iAG/Kaedrs9CHnmzxV5wN/sdwSFL5kUayYB7fOj8tibQeJ8lVxDwOCcvZ5e1HDUt6 Eyw9bYD/Vc3XQ6ewNzogljwTx5dHsG/B8zeRg4++a07dNrAscNEIyB5OK1WoFTE4y1 lgyMZ5ogGwAn912cRhZhZtZ9HOOABpXu/uizL450= Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:12:23 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Francesco Dolcini Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Lukas Wunner , Kalle Valo , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 174/197] wifi: mwifiex: Support SD8978 chipset Message-ID: <2024022106-speculate-scallion-67a7@gregkh> References: <20240220204841.073267068@linuxfoundation.org> <20240220204846.279064097@linuxfoundation.org> <20240221080353.GB5131@francesco-nb> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240221080353.GB5131@francesco-nb> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 09:03:53AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:52:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Lukas Wunner > > > > [ Upstream commit bba047f15851c8b053221f1b276eb7682d59f755 ] > > > > The Marvell SD8978 (aka NXP IW416) uses identical registers as SD8987, > > so reuse the existing mwifiex_reg_sd8987 definition. > > > > Note that mwifiex_reg_sd8977 and mwifiex_reg_sd8997 are likewise > > identical, save for the fw_dump_ctrl register: They define it as 0xf0 > > whereas mwifiex_reg_sd8987 defines it as 0xf9. I've verified that > > 0xf9 is the correct value on SD8978. NXP's out-of-tree driver uses > > 0xf9 for all of them, so there's a chance that 0xf0 is not correct > > in the mwifiex_reg_sd8977 and mwifiex_reg_sd8997 definitions. I cannot > > test that for lack of hardware, hence am leaving it as is. > > > > NXP has only released a firmware which runs Bluetooth over UART. > > Perhaps Bluetooth over SDIO is unsupported by this chipset. > > Consequently, only an "sdiouart" firmware image is referenced, not an > > alternative "sdsd" image. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner > > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/536b4f17a72ca460ad1b07045757043fb0778988.1674827105.git.lukas@wunner.de > > Stable-dep-of: 1c5d463c0770 ("wifi: mwifiex: add extra delay for firmware ready") > > I would drop this and 1c5d463c0770. Why? Commit 1c5d463c0770 was explicitly tagged for stable inclusion, what changed? thanks, greg k-h