[PATCH 6.1 191/195] mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-27T14:21:42Z

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

commit 584f3894262634596532cf43a5e782e34a0ce374 upstream.

Just the same as userspace PM, a new parameter needs_id is added for
in-kernel PM mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr() too.

Add a new helper mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to check whether an address
ID is set from PM or not.

In mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(), needs_id is always true, but in
mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(), pass mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to
needs_it.

Fixes: efd5a4c04e18 ("mptcp: add the address ID assignment bitmap")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -900,7 +900,8 @@ static void __mptcp_pm_release_addr_entr
}

static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet,
- struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
+ struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry,
+ bool needs_id)
{
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *cur, *del_entry = NULL;
unsigned int addr_max;
@@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_
}
}

- if (!entry->addr.id) {
+ if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) {
find_next:
entry->addr.id = find_next_zero_bit(pernet->id_bitmap,
MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1,
@@ -953,7 +954,7 @@ find_next:
}
}

- if (!entry->addr.id)
+ if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id)
goto out;

__set_bit(entry->addr.id, pernet->id_bitmap);
@@ -1095,7 +1096,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(struct mptc
entry->ifindex = 0;
entry->flags = MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT;
entry->lsk = NULL;
- ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry);
+ ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, true);
if (ret < 0)
kfree(entry);

@@ -1311,6 +1312,18 @@ next:
return 0;
}

+static bool mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(const struct nlattr *attr,
+ struct genl_info *info)
+{
+ struct nlattr *tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX + 1];
+
+ if (!nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX, attr,
+ mptcp_pm_addr_policy, info->extack) &&
+ tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ID])
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
static int mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
@@ -1352,7 +1365,8 @@ static int mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr(struct
goto out_free;
}
}
- ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry);
+ ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry,
+ !mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(attr, info));
if (ret < 0) {
GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "too many addresses or duplicate one");
goto out_free;