[PATCH 5.15 62/84] mptcp: process pending subflow error on close

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-04T21:55:14Z

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

commit 9f1a98813b4b686482e5ef3c9d998581cace0ba6 upstream.

On incoming TCP reset, subflow closing could happen before error
propagation. That in turn could cause the socket error being ignored,
and a missing socket state transition, as reported by Daire-Byrne.

Address the issues explicitly checking for subflow socket error at
close time. To avoid code duplication, factor-out of __mptcp_error_report()
a new helper implementing the relevant bits.

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/429
Fixes: 15cc10453398 ("mptcp: deliver ssk errors to msk")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -688,40 +688,44 @@ static bool __mptcp_ofo_queue(struct mpt
return moved;
}

-void __mptcp_error_report(struct sock *sk)
+static bool __mptcp_subflow_error_report(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
{
- struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
- struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+ int err = sock_error(ssk);
+ int ssk_state;

- mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
- struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
- int err = sock_error(ssk);
- int ssk_state;
+ if (!err)
+ return false;

- if (!err)
- continue;
+ /* only propagate errors on fallen-back sockets or
+ * on MPC connect
+ */
+ if (sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_SENT && !__mptcp_check_fallback(mptcp_sk(sk)))
+ return false;

- /* only propagate errors on fallen-back sockets or
- * on MPC connect
- */
- if (sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_SENT && !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk))
- continue;
+ /* We need to propagate only transition to CLOSE state.
+ * Orphaned socket will see such state change via
+ * subflow_sched_work_if_closed() and that path will properly
+ * destroy the msk as needed.
+ */
+ ssk_state = inet_sk_state_load(ssk);
+ if (ssk_state == TCP_CLOSE && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
+ inet_sk_state_store(sk, ssk_state);
+ WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, -err);
+
+ /* This barrier is coupled with smp_rmb() in mptcp_poll() */
+ smp_wmb();
+ sk_error_report(sk);
+ return true;
+}

- /* We need to propagate only transition to CLOSE state.
- * Orphaned socket will see such state change via
- * subflow_sched_work_if_closed() and that path will properly
- * destroy the msk as needed.
- */
- ssk_state = inet_sk_state_load(ssk);
- if (ssk_state == TCP_CLOSE && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
- inet_sk_state_store(sk, ssk_state);
- WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, -err);
-
- /* This barrier is coupled with smp_rmb() in mptcp_poll() */
- smp_wmb();
- sk_error_report(sk);
- break;
- }
+void __mptcp_error_report(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
+ if (__mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow)))
+ break;
}

/* In most cases we will be able to lock the mptcp socket. If its already
@@ -2309,6 +2313,7 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct soc
/* close acquired an extra ref */
__sock_put(ssk);
}
+ __mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, ssk);
release_sock(ssk);

sock_put(ssk);