[PATCH 5.15 67/84] mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

5.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

commit 584f3894262634596532cf43a5e782e34a0ce374 upstream.

Just the same as userspace PM, a new parameter needs_id is added for
in-kernel PM mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr() too.

Add a new helper mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to check whether an address
ID is set from PM or not.

In mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(), needs_id is always true, but in
mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(), pass mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to
needs_it.

Fixes: efd5a4c04e18 ("mptcp: add the address ID assignment bitmap")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -823,7 +823,8 @@ static bool address_use_port(struct mptc
 }
 
 static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet,
-					     struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
+					     struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry,
+					     bool needs_id)
 {
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *cur;
 	unsigned int addr_max;
@@ -850,7 +851,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (!entry->addr.id) {
+	if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) {
 find_next:
 		entry->addr.id = find_next_zero_bit(pernet->id_bitmap,
 						    MAX_ADDR_ID + 1,
@@ -861,7 +862,7 @@ find_next:
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!entry->addr.id)
+	if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id)
 		goto out;
 
 	__set_bit(entry->addr.id, pernet->id_bitmap);
@@ -1001,7 +1002,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(struct mptc
 	entry->ifindex = 0;
 	entry->flags = 0;
 	entry->lsk = NULL;
-	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry);
+	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, true);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		kfree(entry);
 
@@ -1202,6 +1203,18 @@ next:
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(const struct nlattr *attr,
+				      struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	struct nlattr *tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX + 1];
+
+	if (!nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX, attr,
+					 mptcp_pm_addr_policy, info->extack) &&
+	    tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ID])
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
 	struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
@@ -1228,7 +1241,8 @@ static int mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr(struct
 			return ret;
 		}
 	}
-	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry);
+	ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry,
+						!mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(attr, info));
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "too many addresses or duplicate one");
 		if (entry->lsk)