From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB51536132 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709904856; cv=none; b=Fi7Hwd3d2WnFRsdXH8v3c3lVBdgbc9sqNOJQbWMt6uSvBeELdZy3TNApSfmiIQz4yp2bPTMzYlc4C/xVGkD3KWXpBw/iv3DD/Wk3PX0o4jxEZav1cZTeeGdJC6FhQcarTSz+juOaZTK9pVncK/q/zcZ+mXxqfy4ZG429aCRBJlM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709904856; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wtzrEfjCpn2S+S3f35TVkH99zb8AiS5TmWJuuoHXmU4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Koj30o6Bdf6W4xBMLpC2+bVSA3xRk1dqTphfhSct3pg9ooWc8t5boQ2ik1F23/26kPuMn1ZRuBzJ6Jr7j2Dd+XkKSPJhW033GFAW3gPLILUVQhV2lInFaLyKFWP9NxTdCpVxMIWn1EgLhuwWU85tmrDXl1LPQRaw9mgO9YbeJ8g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b=pUolcqdL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="pUolcqdL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1709904854; x=1741440854; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wtzrEfjCpn2S+S3f35TVkH99zb8AiS5TmWJuuoHXmU4=; b=pUolcqdLC4Cj+xKA2seYYw09dvpiEdJyyX+G5WIjdvgv5YfKK7wubiKP X0MVHL77LOWLvstaQRLdnrfedrMg9IMZSH+kOhUns02uUfgmBg/LLdoVl EuAfhTm16Y8cTcIHGJlAa1X9Fe90gdy8tb4jOq61gVbHNC/B+Qyh1Y8qW gOfpIn2HPdS/6G2Y2rqO//IJfgrKSX5GwF5yUx2b/f53gdS6nUjIZ6wth jQIKAgdz5gxjqG9YULWqJcb98Bp+XfQ1YImbVkwQSwsLw3BVD2wPs8/OP IF2Pz0iZ5/HawbQwuqPi23RxznycAtuq4Oa17tNycmd64raxBUBiD9rl3 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VD82c0PPRy2Nn/u1qslXzg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: o6a2Q6TZS8aGv9j+QzMa4Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,109,1708412400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="184672992" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 08 Mar 2024 06:34:12 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.87.72) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.87.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:34:06 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:34:03 -0700 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:33:19 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/219] 6.1.77-rc1 review Message-ID: <20240308-unpaved-greeter-d665418b2e1d@wendy> References: <20240203035317.354186483@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dzUFsazBGNPyODmn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240203035317.354186483@linuxfoundation.org> --dzUFsazBGNPyODmn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:02:53PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.77 release. > There are 219 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Again, I'm super late here but I did test this the other day.. Tested-by: Conor Dooley Thanks, Conor. --dzUFsazBGNPyODmn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZesTnwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0rfEAQCNKqC+fC+rw8+CbZLtht2tc29yoTm26p2VIAy31JFFdQD+Ma9jKC5Q3zB9 YfeKWtS6nxOGy0+KWn/D8m4HyFLESAA= =8rQb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dzUFsazBGNPyODmn--