From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6EB181F; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719940590; cv=none; b=nahv5Svj3B4qYjTctE/7b0tt8RmS3cZueWKB9C4Toe0/hZftggaJU+SxJBzrncYroPvCVfJxRZWBsPvX5YkdFnYyOzM88dx76qtg+xHk+AOdX9KiiLj+TvIggtyEYnhMof4140u50bAX+xNIGW2AW41O2VArLK2QFHdQ4jIvxx8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719940590; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Nu6I9D/dg3SaPx/mjdwHphyliKXju/f0SXc922JNhlQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=jkcsh7wn5hTt+xh0M9UMmyHpB5IU50VdvQmkSdGf7vZMAevVC0vV6u0fC3/L8vrDAZ+a9jmf8jv1pcWZW8KPm7i/8NOM02ESfu8cow0p0AZssO9GjlALpwz+bwMdlRsPGtLnc7+HkTf53LwbMfuBJGPGsro06r8DxzEy4SqlqIs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=j4MH4G3k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="j4MH4G3k" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C3B0C116B1; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:16:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1719940590; bh=Nu6I9D/dg3SaPx/mjdwHphyliKXju/f0SXc922JNhlQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=j4MH4G3kM9G9YwTLPbmhHwrkz9AzkPuK0oswl+A/7lGoJ/Sn88NdQ28Y177hMDtOl 7/fnywX28iqdn1Rw4JOA5AUbgadGnmaTWSB6CA7OCaSqnGkpQXuZFUR/hnq5ddKHTk kbyb51dA4RzHF+BacPjVKkg93mdhQEu1f1Ql/+V0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Janusz Krzysztofik , Andi Shyti , Jani Nikula Subject: [PATCH 6.9 183/222] drm/i915/gt: Fix potential UAF by revoke of fence registers Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:03:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20240702170250.976382109@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 In-Reply-To: <20240702170243.963426416@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20240702170243.963426416@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Janusz Krzysztofik commit 996c3412a06578e9d779a16b9e79ace18125ab50 upstream. CI has been sporadically reporting the following issue triggered by igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck on ADL-P and similar machines: <6> [414.049203] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_evict_fence ... <6> [414.068804] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: submission enabled <6> [414.068812] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GT0: GUC: SLPC enabled <3> [414.070354] Unable to pin Y-tiled fence; err:-4 <3> [414.071282] i915_vma_revoke_fence:301 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(&fence->active)) ... <4>[ 609.603992] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[ 609.603995] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c:301! <4>[ 609.604003] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI <4>[ 609.604006] CPU: 0 PID: 268 Comm: kworker/u64:3 Tainted: G U W 6.9.0-CI_DRM_14785-g1ba62f8cea9c+ #1 <4>[ 609.604008] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR4 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.4035.A00.2301200723 01/20/2023 <4>[ 609.604010] Workqueue: i915 __i915_gem_free_work [i915] <4>[ 609.604149] RIP: 0010:i915_vma_revoke_fence+0x187/0x1f0 [i915] ... <4>[ 609.604271] Call Trace: <4>[ 609.604273] ... <4>[ 609.604716] __i915_vma_evict+0x2e9/0x550 [i915] <4>[ 609.604852] __i915_vma_unbind+0x7c/0x160 [i915] <4>[ 609.604977] force_unbind+0x24/0xa0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605098] i915_vma_destroy+0x2f/0xa0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605210] __i915_gem_object_pages_fini+0x51/0x2f0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605330] __i915_gem_free_objects.isra.0+0x6a/0xc0 [i915] <4>[ 609.605440] process_scheduled_works+0x351/0x690 ... In the past, there were similar failures reported by CI from other IGT tests, observed on other platforms. Before commit 63baf4f3d587 ("drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity before unbinding a GGTT fence"), i915_vma_revoke_fence() was waiting for idleness of vma->active via fence_update(). That commit introduced vma->fence->active in order for the fence_update() to be able to wait selectively on that one instead of vma->active since only idleness of fence registers was needed. But then, another commit 0d86ee35097a ("drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal") replaced the call to fence_update() in i915_vma_revoke_fence() with only fence_write(), and also added that GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(&fence->active)) in front. No justification was provided on why we might then expect idleness of vma->fence->active without first waiting on it. The issue can be potentially caused by a race among revocation of fence registers on one side and sequential execution of signal callbacks invoked on completion of a request that was using them on the other, still processed in parallel to revocation of those fence registers. Fix it by waiting for idleness of vma->fence->active in i915_vma_revoke_fence(). Fixes: 0d86ee35097a ("drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/10021 Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.8+ Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240603195446.297690-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com (cherry picked from commit 24bb052d3dd499c5956abad5f7d8e4fd07da7fb1) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ void i915_vma_revoke_fence(struct i915_v return; GEM_BUG_ON(fence->vma != vma); + i915_active_wait(&fence->active); GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_active_is_idle(&fence->active)); GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&fence->pin_count));