From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65FAB1F95A; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722009917; cv=none; b=BKou5SzDbo6H5CT4gUM7nbtVcrDi3UAw9YKuzSuis/Q93QVlH7g4jONnOpvbxnDYipd7R5hV4Z54mSA4KmGHbwCWpZ7j+RvFyuIFopJWEmBhuD6Jdj9IiHFkDJluOwQHQ3xhLcSD+qic2ZMjNs2GZge6O8xIZpkod3BEwTdyStk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722009917; c=relaxed/simple; bh=80qH2fK6o+0BhmVLaRnz4mmCIpsJTSBPktVx+ABuJZ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=V9lo/JxqyQQyin3IlepCHHaBms926rvrpDC94PDgDlj0sRTy2uAkOYAcH2uv7nsJa0zGHHV2LosrLg4Q/fxBQ1/v9GvlUB7OCll9XzqWBbRiaChQMKE9I34qWZFRcp5k8gD6IcZLi9hmc67/8unhUO99lWP2THO/I/2XpmGik4k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rJculWPG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rJculWPG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67E8FC32782; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:05:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722009917; bh=80qH2fK6o+0BhmVLaRnz4mmCIpsJTSBPktVx+ABuJZ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rJculWPGpDEDyDt1DHD9k2mJQhIK/juZec/iz2IxDUW60aAdjrdg14TJ7LuMKi1jY XZ448GcHPp9Mnw2S27TMzHEeKVezYuk3+9ajqubr8kjY5+L5O1br7KYqjnFKZiq8gJ dE67l0epRawIWCPFwGlgb9FFsbAaStvgWoQXNF4Yk1ULgy2jVQz8T7s0fPsrjYQn3c oEgJmHEHpjt1ok8a+JYemSr/KDOAZCMVQMP/VSRnrZsOli9oPK1wnBNInPd37wjk4F pTrpUvMtEkSiZ6QX4kb/r+/LfrwY9RsZT8+jEwXqmcSlQcebca4KD2Hf/R2Yzatlwa neQKQK5zDAM2A== From: SeongJae Park To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: SeongJae Park , Linus Torvalds , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, David Laight , Andy Shevchenko , Christoph Hellwig , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 70/87] minmax: relax check to allow comparison between unsigned arguments and signed constants Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 09:05:13 -0700 Message-Id: <20240726160513.52282-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <2024072659-edging-sloped-1a51@gregkh> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 07:21:30 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:58:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 07:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > 5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > I assume the min/max patches had some reason to be backported that is > > probably mentioned somewhere in the forest of patches, but I missed > > it. > > It wasn't specifically called out here, but yes, they were needed for > the DAEMON fix. And they will be needed in the future probably as well > because we have run into this problem many times when backporting > patches (i.e. the backport throws tons of warnings because the min/max > changes are not there.) For others' information, the original backporting request including the detail is available at https://lore.kernel.org/20240716183333.138498-1-sj@kernel.org Also, s/DAEMON/DAMON/ ;) > > Same for 6.1.y, which is why they are there too. > > > It's ok, but people are literally talking about this set of patches > > causing a big slowdown in building the kernel, with some files going > > from less than a second to build to being 15+ seconds because of the > > preprocessor expansion they can cause. > > I saw that hopefully if that gets resolved in your tree we can backport > the needed changes here tool. I agree. Thanks, SJ > > thanks, > > greg k-h