[PATCH 4.19 64/96] btrfs: clean up our handling of refs == 0 in snapshot delete

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

[ Upstream commit b8ccef048354074a548f108e51d0557d6adfd3a3 ]

In reada we BUG_ON(refs == 0), which could be unkind since we aren't
holding a lock on the extent leaf and thus could get a transient
incorrect answer.  In walk_down_proc we also BUG_ON(refs == 0), which
could happen if we have extent tree corruption.  Change that to return
-EUCLEAN.  In do_walk_down() we catch this case and handle it correctly,
however we return -EIO, which -EUCLEAN is a more appropriate error code.
Finally in walk_up_proc we have the same BUG_ON(refs == 0), so convert
that to proper error handling.  Also adjust the error message so we can
actually do something with the information.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 635d51c8098d..6b8ece5175ef 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -8409,7 +8409,15 @@ static noinline void reada_walk_down(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		/* We don't care about errors in readahead. */
 		if (ret < 0)
 			continue;
-		BUG_ON(refs == 0);
+
+		/*
+		 * This could be racey, it's conceivable that we raced and end
+		 * up with a bogus refs count, if that's the case just skip, if
+		 * we are actually corrupt we will notice when we look up
+		 * everything again with our locks.
+		 */
+		if (refs == 0)
+			continue;
 
 		if (wc->stage == DROP_REFERENCE) {
 			if (refs == 1)
@@ -8476,7 +8484,11 @@ static noinline int walk_down_proc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		BUG_ON(ret == -ENOMEM);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-		BUG_ON(wc->refs[level] == 0);
+		if (unlikely(wc->refs[level] == 0)) {
+			btrfs_err(fs_info, "bytenr %llu has 0 references, expect > 0",
+				  eb->start);
+			return -EUCLEAN;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (wc->stage == DROP_REFERENCE) {
@@ -8584,8 +8596,9 @@ static noinline int do_walk_down(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	if (unlikely(wc->refs[level - 1] == 0)) {
-		btrfs_err(fs_info, "Missing references.");
-		ret = -EIO;
+		btrfs_err(fs_info, "bytenr %llu has 0 references, expect > 0",
+			  bytenr);
+		ret = -EUCLEAN;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 	*lookup_info = 0;
@@ -8753,7 +8766,12 @@ static noinline int walk_up_proc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 				path->locks[level] = 0;
 				return ret;
 			}
-			BUG_ON(wc->refs[level] == 0);
+			if (unlikely(wc->refs[level] == 0)) {
+				btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(eb, path->locks[level]);
+				btrfs_err(fs_info, "bytenr %llu has 0 references, expect > 0",
+					  eb->start);
+				return -EUCLEAN;
+			}
 			if (wc->refs[level] == 1) {
 				btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(eb, path->locks[level]);
 				path->locks[level] = 0;
-- 
2.43.0