From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326A61DE8BC; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739954415; cv=none; b=P3MYz/Z2LT8it7auEBLWDQRQr/HK6RqXu971Gs/jkvZXAj32CGnloFyAy65x/RY0xaYEA/rSdTkFvI3+iNu/+rMNqbnXQU3BhpnObavk0JmRkv4dsqEsRw73PacdasJXcjb63DK5IwpeuHwz4ehbMCheR27jz5fSQmsPvavLJ6A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739954415; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DlnjLQt8sA9HArA12eXAEiliyii55G8RGApVpmhGxiY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gAqKH71XJGqPqgXVshbUBNAXQJmwjd5WJlS9XaQZ/O8+Dg1MROAj0BmH5N7E/XAoNW6fD5XW08Vvf2R4uX/fTa9iaocLBxl7Jfg7lBWZD2heRaY4HkWjmPIUEP0eDC9JFydG/oSoeCk50wwSK145MtfzozWSuPjj0qA0u3Onh6w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=GMzmAf/h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="GMzmAf/h" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABF79C4CEE6; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:40:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1739954415; bh=DlnjLQt8sA9HArA12eXAEiliyii55G8RGApVpmhGxiY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GMzmAf/hNtHmrCbDeUMn13UwQW4u/tdFZCzL17wEx3gjioVijpRtZMBpE3geXv20c v71osRQpBKvoONWTg/vbgKUKtEkjjHWcDIhZ/yB0YkuGWpa8Lyznvyk1zdO0j2UuuO mqoxYmQvaB57hoB9H/0CgLJlkanI9eDQ8L5l6jtY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Waiman Long , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , John Stultz , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.13 197/274] clocksource: Use pr_info() for "Checking clocksource synchronization" message Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:27:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20250219082617.293581980@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: <20250219082609.533585153@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20250219082609.533585153@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.68 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Waiman Long [ Upstream commit 1f566840a82982141f94086061927a90e79440e5 ] The "Checking clocksource synchronization" message is normally printed when clocksource_verify_percpu() is called for a given clocksource if both the CLOCK_SOURCE_UNSTABLE and CLOCK_SOURCE_VERIFY_PERCPU flags are set. It is an informational message and so pr_info() is the correct choice. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: John Stultz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250125015442.3740588-1-longman@redhat.com Stable-dep-of: 6bb05a33337b ("clocksource: Use migrate_disable() to avoid calling get_random_u32() in atomic context") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index 7304d7cf47f2d..77d9566d3aa68 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -382,7 +382,8 @@ void clocksource_verify_percpu(struct clocksource *cs) return; } testcpu = smp_processor_id(); - pr_warn("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); + pr_info("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", + cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_chosen) { if (cpu == testcpu) continue; -- 2.39.5