[PATCH 6.14 091/145] dma-buf: insert memory barrier before updating num_fences

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hyejeong Choi <hjeong.choi@samsung.com>

commit 72c7d62583ebce7baeb61acce6057c361f73be4a upstream.

smp_store_mb() inserts memory barrier after storing operation.
It is different with what the comment is originally aiming so Null
pointer dereference can be happened if memory update is reordered.

Signed-off-by: Hyejeong Choi <hjeong.choi@samsung.com>
Fixes: a590d0fdbaa5 ("dma-buf: Update reservation shared_count after adding the new fence")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250513020638.GA2329653@au1-maretx-p37.eng.sarc.samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
@@ -320,8 +320,9 @@ void dma_resv_add_fence(struct dma_resv
 	count++;
 
 	dma_resv_list_set(fobj, i, fence, usage);
-	/* pointer update must be visible before we extend the num_fences */
-	smp_store_mb(fobj->num_fences, count);
+	/* fence update must be visible before we extend the num_fences */
+	smp_wmb();
+	fobj->num_fences = count;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_add_fence);