From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0045D1EDA26; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750252760; cv=none; b=gSisdOyOmwlVwiUU8Ae8KpLW8JNaGi0rtDtKIJpYxY4XW5zli462rDCxqJkhLJyKoOlfNYgAr6sU0a0oCt7Qadi0Gi7vxhKy6k+gp5m30h4XEAMk5QvwWTZGyFlFjBKLNy1fho9IKCaOf8ouBaRdMNZUwh7x8dGpw+5M6Jq31Uo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750252760; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yazIh7NKfaZXE4pU90+4eALmFMirOeimrbYE23sXx+A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ure7NzVdXMG/FwCVJyZeQifHTfXG3lLctF30FSl0bZI0qszf/qoi2fpFiljL6vQ8QZVrvINspELEFvZLIirHSlHkyrUNXzxPwzpOQtgyxeOhywkpazBrL+NLXseHIBO3lsHUCyQoUlfb+Y2pBTO83+rE6XDNO6Ysj/lAAefy30A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=jEZmVs+F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="jEZmVs+F" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B761C4CEE7; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:19:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1750252759; bh=yazIh7NKfaZXE4pU90+4eALmFMirOeimrbYE23sXx+A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jEZmVs+FdSqcpXlWWnIGHErQ0wEcRACsKMEnd3vOjr0/P9S7o7NIYUrkM1l1BRoen HOrzZLfN4a/75e98Axi628ZwCTHiWGFhOBlmH6VeDGHX9mWpqy6he1qyiVuK8zEKFi 0cwlrQoufnhr5N9qCbAnXYBZNq7UE4hbD9gfpaDw= Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:19:11 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Mark Brown Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= , Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/780] 6.15.3-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025061858-reproduce-revolving-cae0@gregkh> References: <20250617152451.485330293@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:58:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 05:15:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.3 release. > > There are 780 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > This breaks the build of the arm64 selftests due to a change in nolibc, > it appears that "tools/nolibc: properly align dirent buffer" is missing > some dependency: > > aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -s -Os -nostdlib \ > -include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h -I../..\ > -static -ffreestanding -Wall za-fork.c /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork-asm.o -o /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork > In file included from ./../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h:107, > from : > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h: In function ‘readdir_r’: > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’ > 62 | char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:84: error: expected expression before ‘struct’ > 62 | char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64); > | ^~~~~~ > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: error: ‘buf’ undeclared (first use in this function) > 63 | struct linux_dirent64 *ldir = (void *)buf; > | ^~~ > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in Thanks for the report, I'll go drop all nolibc patches from the queues for now. greg k-h