From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1121F3085D7; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750321224; cv=none; b=T30xI9gQeGkutR5+hH9+VJK2ylW7fp/ah7Pq196aOTRBHzdGxTSfCyUndHsixxMLwCHce0fXsieZPlYFcq5hvaO9suEdex1u9t6kFYr1aEQJWkFzCyV3HcPfUjcyMbbpWMMxImN2mw2Mdw85m0xXy4MHT4Z+Xd7gA35q6PNm7vk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750321224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rs1SQZAjM42eP1OdPF5cxc7T68ok0Dt9YGM0X0I/GSI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ShzOdD6pzM9OPAFFhi+Xj1B/DwhBJpu0LsJ3cWPHdISGW3u1tqfwIy1aOm6+P4hKVrEc/+06ARQguG/j2SGtwnEJdw2ZASd80XX3PZeOxNtddF0KgOmDCEKPdJUy4Bhxhbr3L0UIxMA5a8fiwOMr/baPPnpMMBPk7pLSXRnv73Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=iM39Y27l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="iM39Y27l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF376C4CEEA; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:20:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1750321223; bh=rs1SQZAjM42eP1OdPF5cxc7T68ok0Dt9YGM0X0I/GSI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iM39Y27luLaflYHgryXb8/VAbHnzQmHzyVsZrnjWmLzWdooBDAeiGqi+GgHNjJxvm 00nQywoISyVUd/nEX3+lO3HlQJ7YLrDDdi4PN/K0odYO1fi1ny/pSvD8J7sLfxes8M h8QYlQjosPQ6KZ2wGEJImAcu7eks3bxDYzqGtWQA= Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:20:20 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Mark Brown , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/780] 6.15.3-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025061907-finance-dodgy-b0ae@gregkh> References: <20250617152451.485330293@linuxfoundation.org> <2025061858-reproduce-revolving-cae0@gregkh> <1081af30-1273-4a9a-a864-f59f1cb54fd1@t-8ch.de> <2025061949-epilepsy-punk-fb4e@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 07:50:43AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2025-06-19 06:19:52+0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 04:15:09PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > On 2025-06-18 15:19:11+0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:58:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 05:15:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.3 release. > > > > > > There are 780 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > This breaks the build of the arm64 selftests due to a change in nolibc, > > > > > it appears that "tools/nolibc: properly align dirent buffer" is missing > > > > > some dependency: > > > > > > > > > > aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -s -Os -nostdlib \ > > > > > -include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h -I../..\ > > > > > -static -ffreestanding -Wall za-fork.c /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork-asm.o -o /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork > > > > > In file included from ./../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h:107, > > > > > from : > > > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h: In function ‘readdir_r’: > > > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’ > > > > > 62 | char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64); > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:84: error: expected expression before ‘struct’ > > > > > 62 | char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64); > > > > > | ^~~~~~ > > > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: error: ‘buf’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > > > > 63 | struct linux_dirent64 *ldir = (void *)buf; > > > > > | ^~~ > > > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report, I'll go drop all nolibc patches from the queues > > > > for now. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Shouldn't the bots apply prerequisite patches from the series automatically? > > > > Hopefully yes, obviously it doesn't always work :) > > Is there something we can do to help the tools? That's up to Sasha, he has the tools that do this. > > > This patch comes from [0] and the prerequisite is in there. > > > > > > Also all nolibc patches which should go to stable are tagged as such. > > > Can you configure the bots not to pick up any nolibc patches automatically? > > > > Yes we can! I will add the needed regex to the file: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/ignore_list > > should it be: > > tools/include/nolibc/* > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/* > > ? > > Looks good, thanks. Great, I'll go make that change now. thanks, greg k-h