From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4D818DB20; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 04:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750306796; cv=none; b=iFo83t98sf68d19m4XfNwDbvfB6y9regEDopeSbBDESH7kv6NuDblD4bOaDlIXNREaiFEIoinxaAPITv08VsepDmizLcDvai9m6WPi40JSldx09gu6oWsbAro2SrXqhXNczdMA26LqqdlQAUK2PvHwYefGd2n5oAndzn9yYTY4A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750306796; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a9ggqrpObwdtIrfKwVaF/LF6VA9WOZyLDWaH9jkVu1E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XuDCeqmFmKBJK0PvO5fiO9fhUrthrDP9eUcRe4h3ZR2fGJkml4L29Jz1SCP8Iq6mOeWZ1H/B5bT9mTV1vuhZChCxyYMD18jX0VR2Ymm7YTFaE/6TzjjPb/Jzydp3vYBzbadKR2gG/saqMQDMrjyajP5GamzyMIPdPHzZoNR75Ss= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=A3HRrakB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="A3HRrakB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A9B1C4CEEA; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 04:19:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1750306796; bh=a9ggqrpObwdtIrfKwVaF/LF6VA9WOZyLDWaH9jkVu1E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=A3HRrakBvuWxgvKb0YUerydvdMum3gbzzQhEgz1mPObyTOPaV94X4/qY0NaaFTM7k 5ZkVXrgflvY1FW66q115LL5uu1QO4sFwXmbArDYDbdXh7WPzfCw/NJJ7w85pGQe4ac /nOWNJXF1n3WIfNdV1CghXcMmDmn3keh7niHq/QI= Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:19:52 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Mark Brown , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/780] 6.15.3-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025061949-epilepsy-punk-fb4e@gregkh> References: <20250617152451.485330293@linuxfoundation.org> <2025061858-reproduce-revolving-cae0@gregkh> <1081af30-1273-4a9a-a864-f59f1cb54fd1@t-8ch.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1081af30-1273-4a9a-a864-f59f1cb54fd1@t-8ch.de> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 04:15:09PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2025-06-18 15:19:11+0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:58:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 05:15:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.3 release. > > > > There are 780 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > This breaks the build of the arm64 selftests due to a change in nolibc, > > > it appears that "tools/nolibc: properly align dirent buffer" is missing > > > some dependency: > > > > > > aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -s -Os -nostdlib \ > > > -include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h -I../..\ > > > -static -ffreestanding -Wall za-fork.c /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork-asm.o -o /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork > > > In file included from ./../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h:107, > > > from : > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h: In function ‘readdir_r’: > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’ > > > 62 | char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:84: error: expected expression before ‘struct’ > > > 62 | char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64); > > > | ^~~~~~ > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: error: ‘buf’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > > 63 | struct linux_dirent64 *ldir = (void *)buf; > > > | ^~~ > > > ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > > > Thanks for the report, I'll go drop all nolibc patches from the queues > > for now. > > Thanks. > > Shouldn't the bots apply prerequisite patches from the series automatically? Hopefully yes, obviously it doesn't always work :) > This patch comes from [0] and the prerequisite is in there. > > Also all nolibc patches which should go to stable are tagged as such. > Can you configure the bots not to pick up any nolibc patches automatically? Yes we can! I will add the needed regex to the file: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/ignore_list should it be: tools/include/nolibc/* tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/* ? thanks, greg k-h