From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 447B217A2E8; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750760288; cv=none; b=FQURR/7QDT9wjvbv7kkKpZm9W7/QznR1jfJGniXSFb6a0d9YUhWYw/2RytBzLbrHuVsxpzJkchUaL4EHaddtVqqzADoydGIxTDZnAqm+aq+VpLDKoTshk6XECsZWAyvI8173FaReWWJ9WlQBeQmUzw1m7v8PqX4psSvQpLiWYbk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750760288; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H7Gk/NckKVvh/MfBLeEYzkGkI+wdO7PXVtA1Vt7lAyo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=j4v0iHCc3nsYYkq9w/ebfRrMP0Uvqu6y7pC5fk+bsukPABP8BjQf73fGgWSk+ny0YoA2wptG8NiZH6CuTZ8MgrXBHtLPl1PTPAEsSHn082Tq8hKv4rBsaoACm9VVaqp+4aTfFLpj1mCKnGvDDAXezQGxIMf+D1zNsYrzCQr5fMk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=bCmVGiDy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="bCmVGiDy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 927ADC4CEE3; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:18:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1750760288; bh=H7Gk/NckKVvh/MfBLeEYzkGkI+wdO7PXVtA1Vt7lAyo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bCmVGiDyagJ0zN1w6ebouItQ3WIH3bc/glJyADeuNJaV6GfYeq61ENJ30nvIH4Ikt zbBBlIwXDUJ9dqS6wmBPkmzkWDHw+3jG0DgzWZd9Beb0vROQUfOiMsQ/7QQJfj3tnH ChYD5N8u306aGPCvefK4Z5kKWbsIPW5DVq9vMJM4= Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:18:04 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/411] 5.15.186-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025062439-tamer-diner-68e9@gregkh> References: <20250623130632.993849527@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:12:05AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 18:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.186 release. > > There are 411 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:51 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.186-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Regressions on arm64 allyesconfig builds with gcc-12 and clang failed on > the Linux stable-rc 5.15.186-rc1. > > Regressions found on arm64 > * arm64, build > - gcc-12-allyesconfig > > Regression Analysis: > - New regression? Yes > - Reproducibility? Yes > > Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.186-rc1 arm64 > drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:702:9: error: positional initialization > of field in 'struct' declared with 'designated_init' attribute > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > ## Build errors > drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:702:9: error: positional initialization > of field in 'struct' declared with 'designated_init' attribute > [-Werror=designated-init] > 702 | { > | ^ > drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:702:9: note: (near initialization for > 'qedf_cb_ops') > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors I saw this locally, at times, it's random, not always showing up. Turn off the gcc randconfig build option and it goes away, which explains the randomness I guess. If you can bisect this to a real change that causes it, please let me know, I couldn't figure it out and so just gave up as I doubt anyone is really using that gcc plugin for that kernel version. thanks, greg k-h