From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>,
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] iommu/pages: Add support for a incoherent IOMMU page walker
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:32:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729223240.GC82395@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00c5972b-a5d9-4604-aea6-cc0d8e2601a0@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 04:41:03PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 7/17/2025 3:57 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > @@ -98,4 +101,36 @@ static inline void *iommu_alloc_pages_sz(gfp_t gfp, size_t size)
> > return iommu_alloc_pages_node_sz(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp, size);
> > }
> > -#endif /* __IOMMU_PAGES_H */
> > +int iommu_pages_start_incoherent(void *virt, struct device *dma_dev);
> > +int iommu_pages_start_incoherent_list(struct iommu_pages_list *list,
> > + struct device *dma_dev);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > +
> > +static inline void iommu_pages_flush_incoherent(struct device *dma_dev,
> > + void *virt, size_t offset,
> > + size_t len)
> > +{
> > + clflush_cache_range(virt + offset, len);
> > +}
> > +static inline void
> > +iommu_pages_stop_incoherent_list(struct iommu_pages_list *list,
> > + struct device *dma_dev)
> > +{
>
> Do we need to clear iopt->incoherent for X86, given that
> iopt->incoherent is set in the start path?
No.. When I wrote this I felt we may as well keep x86 fast since it
doesn't use the DMA API and did it like this:
static void __iommu_free_desc(struct ioptdesc *iopt)
{
[..]
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86))
WARN_ON_ONCE(iopt->incoherent);
To largely ignore the incoherent flag.
So:
/*
* For performance leave the incoherent flag alone which turns this into
* a NOP. For X86 the rest of the stop/free flow ignores the flag.
*/
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 19:57 [PATCH 0/9] Convert Intel VT-D to use the generic iommu page table Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] iommu/pages: Add support for a incoherent IOMMU page walker Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-21 8:41 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-29 22:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-30 1:49 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-11 21:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-15 11:28 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 21:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] iommupt: Add basic support for SW bits in the page table Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-15 11:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-18 23:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] iommupt: Use the incoherent start/stop functions for PT_FEAT_DMA_INCOHERENT Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-15 11:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 20:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 4/9] iommupt: Flush the CPU cache after any writes to the page table Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] iommupt: Add the Intel VT-D second stage page table format Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-22 3:11 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-29 23:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 2:00 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-22 9:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 14:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] iommupt/x86: Set the dirty bit only for writable PTEs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-21 10:02 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] iommupt/x86: Support SW bits and permit PT_FEAT_DMA_INCOHERENT Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-22 5:17 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-29 23:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-30 2:35 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-22 9:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 14:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] iommu/vt-d: Use the generic iommu page table Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-22 6:44 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-29 23:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 9:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 20:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 19:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] iommupt: Add a kunit test for the SW bits Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729223240.GC82395@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tina.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).