[PATCH 6.12 019/117] xfrm: state: use a consistent pcpu_id in xfrm_state_find

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>

[ Upstream commit 7eb11c0ab70777b9e5145a5ba1c0a2312c3980b2 ]

If we get preempted during xfrm_state_find, we could run
xfrm_state_look_at using a different pcpu_id than the one
xfrm_state_find saw. This could lead to ignoring states that should
have matched, and triggering acquires on a CPU that already has a pcpu
state.

    xfrm_state_find starts on CPU1
    pcpu_id = 1
    lookup starts
    <preemption, we're now on CPU2>
    xfrm_state_look_at pcpu_id = 2
       finds a state
found:
    best->pcpu_num != pcpu_id (2 != 1)
    if (!x && !error && !acquire_in_progress) {
        ...
        xfrm_state_alloc
        xfrm_init_tempstate
        ...

This can be avoided by passing the original pcpu_id down to all
xfrm_state_look_at() calls.

Also switch to raw_smp_processor_id, disabling preempting just to
re-enable it immediately doesn't really make sense.

Fixes: 1ddf9916ac09 ("xfrm: Add support for per cpu xfrm state handling.")
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 19 ++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 912a4161a7420..ad0fe88494714 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1242,14 +1242,8 @@ static void xfrm_hash_grow_check(struct net *net, int have_hash_collision)
 static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x,
 			       const struct flowi *fl, unsigned short family,
 			       struct xfrm_state **best, int *acq_in_progress,
-			       int *error)
+			       int *error, unsigned int pcpu_id)
 {
-	/* We need the cpu id just as a lookup key,
-	 * we don't require it to be stable.
-	 */
-	unsigned int pcpu_id = get_cpu();
-	put_cpu();
-
 	/* Resolution logic:
 	 * 1. There is a valid state with matching selector. Done.
 	 * 2. Valid state with inappropriate selector. Skip.
@@ -1316,8 +1310,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
 	/* We need the cpu id just as a lookup key,
 	 * we don't require it to be stable.
 	 */
-	pcpu_id = get_cpu();
-	put_cpu();
+	pcpu_id = raw_smp_processor_id();
 
 	to_put = NULL;
 
@@ -1337,7 +1330,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, encap_family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 
 	if (best)
@@ -1354,7 +1347,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 
 cached:
@@ -1395,7 +1388,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 	if (best || acquire_in_progress)
 		goto found;
@@ -1430,7 +1423,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
 		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
 		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
 			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
-					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
+					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
 	}
 
 found:
-- 
2.39.5