From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54036222580; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755850589; cv=none; b=RPT2qhwupzqlM+jRggCH+A4pxW7Ao1PiCzRL1jsDgAcgIXLbt+pJi8R6IA/4wSu0cgrWitm9ITxbMNxiUPqlvDj3lvjFS0h7ko/OgQfyK0T/LfRMTPWIvuA2hQOzMrqDDnunLf4bNXPYXo7w3TAdhai/qFgRfmB+2PxV3NxwDOU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755850589; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b/vxIm0ScLDuYxESXResXplPHsWNapbvSWd5rO+Uj0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D8jON9x1qYQG5TCseDvgnFFHxknawmrwnlce7ItB8FVXb8oHle+Cd0VOFMaUofdim9B0tuoAZlsOuS0deMI22WW5MlBp1uadYBmVhdXvlNl65L7Pr5VY3BjfFy1jG8bYYrB1O73TDy76LMHlOtGfZWE70kD366azkwBSFCgGJRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=uKuLov9A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="uKuLov9A" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 179E2C4CEF1; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:16:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1755850588; bh=b/vxIm0ScLDuYxESXResXplPHsWNapbvSWd5rO+Uj0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uKuLov9A4TJTzyPfgyNZXJPyjt/6rGkPbh33t2XGjzKv0hEsMCF9e9x1+NFe0Y/H5 MF4j/OShmDyJkaZA4p7PHWHcCE5tOGFuAJNhGvf2Mu7CJmx8tRFq1o2B9RASXyOhMX kUqgozc4Kc9jd/uwfnc9mIxXaUVQAB5fgImH3Rjg= Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 10:16:25 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/438] 6.12.43-rc2 review Message-ID: <2025082231-upstairs-blinks-1f4e@gregkh> References: <20250819122820.553053307@linuxfoundation.org> <63e25fdb-095a-40eb-b341-75781e71ea95@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63e25fdb-095a-40eb-b341-75781e71ea95@roeck-us.net> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 08:12:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:31:21PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.43 release. > > There are 438 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:27:16 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build reference: v6.12.43 > Compiler version: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0 > Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.44 > > Configuration file workarounds: > "s/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=.*/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=0/" > > Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed > -------------- > Error log: > drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c: In function 'ti_hecc_start': > drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c:386:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'BIT_U32'; did you mean 'BIT_ULL'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 386 | mbx_mask = ~BIT_U32(HECC_RX_LAST_MBOX); > | ^~~~~~~ > | BIT_ULL > > There is no BIT_U32 in v6.12.y. The same build error is seen in v6.15.11, > which is also missing the definition of BIT_U32. Odd that no one seems > to have noticed this. Am I missing something ? I'm now seeing this as well. I'm guessing no one else does arm32 full builds anymore? I guess no one cares about that platform anymore :( I'll go revert the offending commit, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h