From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13099274B35; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757428647; cv=none; b=lnC2RxtKeUb4zfmjTzDY+JmrrHMr0OEYThRRIUtBPwRlgx5AfFhyA4enNEWSRhETgvFQCYwrgPdI93NU1OxBCGkbZIY4V3tGQ4qipFhro5JpAiY3i5Rfs1RV8Czn5v6DMOspZU1ZxCcNBA/uciTsmVK/E5xTnuoKWnikCXwkGaQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757428647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9B6l+1qvNym9F+Q7hWtNrLfb/xmJyDUu2VsCTOQjYKg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rjztbF4fXa8gO+HWIH7UDjtotT4ZT+OyA/C96gGKSKFnZ04BKfqSs2hNh5mrXTgV0a/SF4PFpWKZQA/LolBikE3NLWgrRnCElhEe7Zf8PRHVjVsaecGBl5GMwLrOMe3hJjiKBoIKwQHRRJp+wqZdaGtXcnyOrVSwyRmsakyJdXs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=ssV9vF/B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="ssV9vF/B" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9237EC4CEF8; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:37:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1757428646; bh=9B6l+1qvNym9F+Q7hWtNrLfb/xmJyDUu2VsCTOQjYKg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ssV9vF/BGnSH78pTP1v0/PKZEau8qbV7tDq8XjNEIdU7rSA/FyiOteSSx1GaOMy5f MKNSFznYslNyMp2TYcyWE8WcMj/JEb5mTY/xGOxc+x1jiANMzF3eTHIBh1I1mmqLYV /NsJpdtcZVs1suvxRbSudOkfRrBeunS94d93Y2Hg= Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 16:37:22 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, Anders Roxell , Arnd Bergmann , Dan Carpenter , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Ben Copeland Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025090937-neglector-embattled-75ec@gregkh> References: <20250907195603.394640159@linuxfoundation.org> <2025090948-excuse-rebate-e496@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 07:48:18PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 9 Sept 2025 at 15:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:54:56PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release. > > > > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > While building Linux stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig > > > builds failed. > > > > > > * arm64, build > > > - gcc-12-allyesconfig > > > > > > Regression Analysis: > > > - New regression? yes > > > - Reproducibility? yes > > > > > > Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig > > > qede_main.c:199:35: error: initialization of void from incompatible > > > pointer > > > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > > > > > ### build log > > > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:199:35: error: > > > initialization of 'void (*)(void *, u16, u16)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, > > > short unsigned int, short unsigned int)'} from incompatible pointer > > > type 'void (*)(void *, void *, u8)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, void *, > > > unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > > > 199 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > This was reported on the Linux next-20250428 tag, > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs+7-Jut2PM1Z8fXOkBaBuGt0WwTUvU=4cu2O8iQdwUYw@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > Odd, I can't reproduce this here, and nothing has changed in this driver > > at all for this -rc cycle. I see no one responded to the linux-next > > issue either, so any hints? > > Please ignore this allyesconfig build failure for now on 5.15 and 5.10. > Seems like it is my local builder issue. Great, thanks for letting me know, greg k-h