Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/45] 5.4.299-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 02:28:40PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/7/2025 2:08 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/7/2025 12:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.299 release.
> > > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/
> > > patch-5.4.299-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-
> > > rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
> > BMIPS_GENERIC:
> > 
> > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
> > 
> > Looks like we have a minor regression introduced in the 5.4.297 cycle
> > that I will be solving separately:
> 
> Looks like we are missing 9bd9c8026341f75f25c53104eb7e656e357ca1a2 ("usb:
> hub: Fix flushing of delayed work used for post resume purposes") in the
> 5.4.y branch, while we do have a49e1e2e785fb3621f2d748581881b23a364998a
> ("usb: hub: Fix flushing and scheduling of delayed work that tunes runtime
> pm"), looks like the cherry pick is not exactly clean, will work on that
> later today.

Thanks for the backport!