From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A52F6340DB0; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 16:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757436228; cv=none; b=AhY2tJodFDLaaQawQlLAvfPC4d8wOTYTKxRJSZ0Q6iH4C32v/iIKsZNK9i/CbWVD64b3vnUt3RctFMyHF51dEhYqJ6ECjF8Q8ovJaTgCQsVfN4PUqFJfQYnbOSU7fYKIm50rqrKkLqAZ3EUaWQutR8ZX2BBoy4weWF0eTBOh2nE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757436228; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ISgrvfKX34egkTYzE2QQK5KYoABA8hWY/I975oRZhj0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qGqNwO/0OvXWtWrtKY+M1Q03MxCQn8dXc9P9zfcWUAB8yfYOBu9Bi3HvstRL+mOnuAMV6Hk5UUcm2fduJePuOyANqbQekPEYLnLfkvKjPpsh2UXPFD7khU8UNv1t+++0iEHkOfL3/TTd4lMzyZ8u+MswBON4e4xqr7DWgA1byKg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=bifwBcDY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="bifwBcDY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC90DC4CEF4; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 16:43:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1757436228; bh=ISgrvfKX34egkTYzE2QQK5KYoABA8hWY/I975oRZhj0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bifwBcDYabyV+oxPmGNM9lUPMwW99OwMMrMPfy1srHrdM1DzpXReZkMLlPP6uzmwP 0qNmbaRjIioZo0jj48+vKXIwGiQzfF7lLINFpVLqPxOi4YN2sZkCxQH3icvC412xSg b2x4+xSykZAPu5ArhOKpR2NyBxioMQUuOv2TBTKY= Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:43:45 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Florian Fainelli Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/45] 5.4.299-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025090939-trash-emphases-cba8@gregkh> References: <20250907195600.953058118@linuxfoundation.org> <82edb13f-134e-4aaf-ae5d-6b9f80b02e68@gmail.com> <32b78edd-c8a3-45d1-92df-9facadb61d89@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <32b78edd-c8a3-45d1-92df-9facadb61d89@gmail.com> On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 02:28:40PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 9/7/2025 2:08 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 9/7/2025 12:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.299 release. > > > There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/ > > > patch-5.4.299-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable- > > > rc.git linux-5.4.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on > > BMIPS_GENERIC: > > > > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli > > > > Looks like we have a minor regression introduced in the 5.4.297 cycle > > that I will be solving separately: > > Looks like we are missing 9bd9c8026341f75f25c53104eb7e656e357ca1a2 ("usb: > hub: Fix flushing of delayed work used for post resume purposes") in the > 5.4.y branch, while we do have a49e1e2e785fb3621f2d748581881b23a364998a > ("usb: hub: Fix flushing and scheduling of delayed work that tunes runtime > pm"), looks like the cherry pick is not exactly clean, will work on that > later today. Thanks for the backport!