From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF9331A54D; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757413745; cv=none; b=AIEhmnHAkoUQu6+CHwzOXGjbdKhgM2wTXIp1HryWtomrrEvCpVAxI14pP0NxTzrlhbd5nqwd0EtwQGouK5Soan6h4Sg49e0JZoh7Q16JLjMDVPWYnHSAQt0NWDsohVuq5a59tX1Xm9qinMx4OpARlxJHtbL7C4Pl7A7/FmNk1So= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757413745; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l7zRj6dxQGgcSZ09GbWzOqSTRBdDhbfjkwyl+rjpuPA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a5FUzh9/LEjG0TEXb4lpxcx/0XiB0Q0gf9LaX6oV5dSkgf9xpVZRqqAoPrYK3pqV41DI0b/nDBggQWnAmhk3fv68wO5Ed2EO4toeyE03u/fhz0hJax+Jugu5InczEmAtTrTFl+DR790TAwf0YViti6zzUBfi4+v61LwxAPW2Rdw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=XewCZgb2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="XewCZgb2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48ABDC4CEF5; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:29:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1757413744; bh=l7zRj6dxQGgcSZ09GbWzOqSTRBdDhbfjkwyl+rjpuPA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XewCZgb2uGHdj2F4vnjSiyFbBfcXl31BQomkh+xyO765+je1/KyEIDnRqmIgZ0DIK ZyG7yQb/mQRX+J0H1xHFj3lJjwHZ77vvqvsfcxMC8DvgyzhcYgP1ArJBIFDfwTmDqq qACO3YG6tKuM+IqGnkkY4WYzigdZUQLra0zGV0Rg= Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 12:29:01 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, Anders Roxell , Arnd Bergmann , Dan Carpenter , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Ben Copeland Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/64] 5.15.192-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025090948-excuse-rebate-e496@gregkh> References: <20250907195603.394640159@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:54:56PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 01:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.192 release. > > There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:55:53 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.192-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > While building Linux stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 the arm64 allyesconfig > builds failed. > > * arm64, build > - gcc-12-allyesconfig > > Regression Analysis: > - New regression? yes > - Reproducibility? yes > > Build regression: stable-rc 5.15.192-rc1 arm64 allyesconfig > qede_main.c:199:35: error: initialization of void from incompatible > pointer > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > ### build log > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c:199:35: error: > initialization of 'void (*)(void *, u16, u16)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, > short unsigned int, short unsigned int)'} from incompatible pointer > type 'void (*)(void *, void *, u8)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, void *, > unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > 199 | .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > This was reported on the Linux next-20250428 tag, > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs+7-Jut2PM1Z8fXOkBaBuGt0WwTUvU=4cu2O8iQdwUYw@mail.gmail.com/ Odd, I can't reproduce this here, and nothing has changed in this driver at all for this -rc cycle. I see no one responded to the linux-next issue either, so any hints? Also, the definition seems wrong from what you built, here it is with the -rc patch applied: $ git grep arfs_filter_op drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_l2.c: op->arfs_filter_op(dev, cookie, fw_return_code); drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede.h:void qede_arfs_filter_op(void *dev, void *filter, u8 fw_rc); drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_filter.c:void qede_arfs_filter_op(void *dev, void *filter, u8 fw_rc) drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c: .arfs_filter_op = qede_arfs_filter_op, include/linux/qed/qed_if.h: void (*arfs_filter_op)(void *dev, void *fltr, u8 fw_rc); No u16 stuff at all here. thanks, greg k-h